'Vindicating the First Amendment': Law professors win injunction against Trump admin over proposed sanctions for their work with International Criminal Court

21 hours ago 9

President Donald Trump listens during a briefing with the media, Friday, June 27, 2025, astatine  the White House successful  Washington (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin).

President Donald Trump listens during a briefing with the media, Friday, June 27, 2025, astatine the White House successful Washington (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin).

A national justice sitting successful Manhattan this week barred the Trump administration from enforcing sanctions connected 2 U.S. citizens and instrumentality professors who enactment with the International Criminal Court (ICC).

On April 15, Cardozo Law Professor Gabor Rona and CUNY School of Law Professor Lisa Davis filed a 31-page lawsuit against President Donald Trump and respective different members of the national authorities over a February enforcement order that imposes sanctions connected the ICC, prohibits definite interactions with designated ICC officials, and threatens some civilian and transgression penalties for immoderate specified violations.

The suit says Trump's bid "threatens to unconstitutionally enforce civilian and transgression penalties" connected the plaintiffs "for providing education, advice, training, information, analysis, and different services to oregon for the payment of the Prosecutor of the ICC, successful assistance of the ICC's probe and prosecution of warfare crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide."

Those threatened penalties, the plaintiffs constituent out, see up to 20 years down bars for the ineligible acquisition services they provide.

Love existent crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life transgression stories delivered close to your inbox.

Contemporaneously with the lawsuit, the plaintiffs asked the Southern District of New York to contented a preliminary injunction.

In late July, U.S. District Judge Jesse M. Furman, a Barack Obama appointee, much oregon little granted that petition – by issuing a imperishable injunction arsenic to each the defendants but Trump himself.

"In law, arsenic successful life, 2 wrongs bash not marque a right," the justice opined – recalling efforts by the archetypal Trump administration to authorisation ICC-affiliated lawyers, instrumentality professors, and activists.

In fact, Furman noted, the latest anti-ICC effort is "substantially similar" to the earlier effort and uses "the nonstop language" antecedently recovered to beryllium "likely unconstitutional" by different court.

More Law&Crime coverage: Law professors and ACLU inquire national justice to halt 'unconstitutional' Trump-Biden effort to wreck International Criminal Court

On Monday, the justice closed the lawsuit by outlining the particulars of the injunction successful a comparatively terse 3-page judgement and order.

In sum, the tribunal bid bars the Trump medication from "enforcing the civilian oregon transgression punishment provisions of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act" against the instrumentality professors connected the ground of definite enumerated "education, training, analysis, and analytical services provided by them to oregon for the payment of immoderate person" mentioned in, and putatively successful usurpation of, the enforcement order.

Specifically, the Trump medication cannot penalize the instrumentality professors for immoderate of the pursuing activities:

• Submitting oregon contributing to the submission of evidence, argument, grounds oregon amicus curiae briefs to the International Criminal Court;

• Engaging successful advocacy successful enactment of the ICC, to see contributing to publications (including online journals, blogs, podcasts, oregon different publically disposable media) relating to the ICC oregon investigations oregon prosecutions earlier it;

• Organizing oregon participating successful speaking engagements relating to the ICC oregon investigations oregon prosecutions earlier it;

• Discussing the ICC oregon its enactment successful nationalist and backstage fora, including instrumentality schoolhouse courses and different world settings;

• Communicating with the ICC to facilitate occupation placements successful the ICC, oregon successful roles supporting the ICC's prosecutions and investigations;

• Drafting argumentation documents oregon achromatic papers for the ICC's Office of the Prosecutor ("OTP");

• Providing guidance oregon proposal to the ICC regarding policies and investigating, charging, and prosecuting crimes, oregon applications for apprehension warrants;

• Liaising with victims of, and witnesses to, crimes nether probe oregon prosecution successful the ICC for the intent of providing enactment to the OTP;

• Training investigators, analysts, prosecutors, and different unit wrong the OTP;

• Serving connected OTP advisory committees;

• Convening, organizing, oregon participating successful adept sheet workshops and different akin events to assistance the OTP; and

• Presenting to judges and home prosecutors concerning issues pertaining to the ICC.

In effect to an enquiry astir the court's latest order, Rona directed Law&Crime to a connection from his attorneys.

Andrew Loewenstein, the Foley Hoag lawyer who served arsenic pb counsel, praised the ruling for "vindicating the First Amendment rights" of his clients and said the determination "allows them to resume providing captious enactment for the ICC's probe and prosecution of immoderate of the world's astir heinous crimes."

In mid-July, a national tribunal successful Maine enjoined the authorities from enforcing the enforcement bid against 2 quality rights advocates who enactment with the ICC's OTP – again, connected First Amendment grounds.

Read Entire Article