6 hours ago
5
1. "If it were adjacent conscionable a one-time allotment, it would alteration US education, and I mostly hatred the connection 'transform' successful education. We could code carnal infrastructure, bolster teacher salaries, drawback each schoolhouse up connected basal technology, put successful intelligence wellness attraction connected a standard ne'er seen before, and astir wholly eradicate nutrient insecurity among children successful school. Hell, that $265 cardinal could conscionable beryllium enactment successful an endowment, and the gully unsocial would beryllium life-changing for astir everyone."
2. "Politicians and contractors would find a mode to funnel a batch of wealth to their pockets, overmuch successful the aforesaid mode they're doing present with Department of Defense money. It has been known for decades that the DoD is incapable to audit trillions of dollars of transactions. If DOGE truly wanted the US authorities to prevention money, they would person started with subject spending."
3. "The executives moving successful acquisition would mysteriously get wealthier portion schools wouldn't improve."
5. "Absolutely nothing. We already walk much than anyone. Adding much wealth volition apt bash nothing."
6. "Very little, if anything, would change. The occupation with acquisition isn’t lone monetary. There are ample swathes of radical choosing backstage oregon homeschooling due to the fact that spot successful nationalist schools has eroded. More wealth won't hole that."
7. "Will ne'er happen. It's easier to manipulate and segregate radical who are uneducated."
8. "My woman is simply a teacher, and my ma is simply a retired teacher. I cognize a batch of different radical who enactment successful education. My lad is presently successful assemblage to go a teacher. Money is NOT the superior problem. You could springiness each teacher and enactment unit a 25% raise, but it won't hole the occupation with students who are undisciplined and don't privation to learn, oregon parents who are uninvolved."
9. "They dumped tons of currency into the Department of Education, and they whitethorn arsenic good person burned it."
10. "The US has already spent tons of wealth connected acquisition successful the past with small results. Ultimately, it's the parents to blasted for however their children presumption the value of education, and each the wealth successful the satellite isn’t going to alteration that."
11. "Switching a fund without changing the radical would conscionable beryllium a discarded of money. Teacher Unions request to absorption much connected kids than teacher salaries and benefits."
12. "Based purely connected past history, the federation would go adjacent much illiterate, ignorant, innumerate, socially and politically divided, and insecure."
13. "The Department of Education was created successful '71. The United States has 1 of the highest costs per pupil ratios successful the world. We were fig 1 successful acquisition successful 1970. So, no, much wealth won't hole this."
14. "Well, the Department of Education’s fund has grown importantly since it began operating successful 1980...and measurable acquisition values person plummeted ever since. Maybe centralized readying astatine a nationalist level is atrocious for education."
15. "I'd alternatively spot it dumped into a abstraction program, TBH. Few entities person shown a greater propensity for discarded than the Department of Education and the teachers' unions. 'It's FoR tHe ChIlDrEn!' Yeah, right. If you privation Exhibit A of what a racket acquisition tin be, look nary further than astatine the entities that really person wealth — our universities."
16. "College tuition would spell up and backstage colleges would donate to governmental parties astatine grounds levels."
17. "The tube is broken; it doesn't substance however overmuch h2o you effort to propulsion done it. Plenty of stats carnivore this out. Many of the worst districts successful the state get the astir funding."
18. "Parents inactive wouldn’t work to their kids oregon instrumentality immoderate work successful raising them, processing them, oregon imbuing them with values upon which to marque their decisions."
19. "It would get squandered and mismanaged, and thing would change."
20. "Money is not the problem. It's civilization and incentives. Some cultures successful the US bash not worth education, and astir schools don't person an inducement to thatch effectively. If we were superior astir education, it would beryllium year-round, and we'd person schoolhouse prime truthful radical could take amended schools, and they would beryllium firing incompetent teachers."
21. "It would astir apt conscionable mean 3 caller mega shot stadiums built successful the South…"
22. "I'd ask: however does that marque the kids smarter? Someone would past respond by paying teachers much to amended teachers, but the unions won't basal by portion districts occurrence underperforming teachers. If we prosecute much teachers to trim people size, it mightiness help, but you inactive person mediocre teachers who underperform. Money conscionable doesn’t ever correlate to amended outcomes, arsenic evidenced by the existent spending per pupil and trial scores. So the question stands."
23. "A clump of 'education' corporations would beryllium created to connection overpriced 'services' oregon 'curriculum' to schools. The friends and household of the schoolhouse committee and admin would get lucrative no-bid contracts. Real property would beryllium bought. For teachers and students, though? Nothing would fundamentally change. The acquisition strategy is breached and corrupt passim its entirety, and throwing wealth astatine it volition lone payment the charlatans and grifters who already marque a ton of wealth from Education."
What astir moving subject spending to thing else, similar education? Do you hold with these takes? Comment below!
Note: Responses person been edited for length/clarity.
English (US) ·