Last month, I joked astir the $2,000 tariff dividend checks Trump announced on Truth Social, and however determination hadn't seemed to beryllium a peep astir them since November. Well, small did I cognize that Trump seemingly forgot helium adjacent mentioned the idea.
When asked whether Americans could expect to spot their $2,000 checks, arsenic helium promised, Trump reportedly asked New York Times reporters, "I did bash that? When did I bash that?"
So if you inquire me: The president's representation is...questionable, and no, we can't trust connected him to retrieve his OWN promises to the American people.
This is simply a large question! Yes, it's existent that we mostly propulsion our information from government-led agencies similar the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Energy Information Administration. And yes, I'd beryllium lying if I said I don't get a spot acrophobic astir misleading stats.
However, determination are a fewer points that bring maine assurance successful our data:
1. At Economy Hate Watch, we cross-reference our information with reports published by organizations, economists, and different quality outlets to guarantee a just examination. In erstwhile editions, we've shared times erstwhile economists person felt the numbers presented by the Trump medication were misleading, and we'll proceed to bring you that added context.
2. Many employees astatine these agencies person worked determination for YEARS. They've crunched the numbers nether antithetic presidents — careless of their enactment — and passim antithetic eras successful America. When Trump bullies them, and helium has, these economists are speedy to telephone it retired successful a precise nationalist mode and garbage to bend.
It's bully to beryllium cautious astir information. We're cautious, too, and ever striving to bring you the astir close information available. If we're ever missing anything, consciousness escaped to permission america a comment! I work them all.

2 days ago
7



English (US) ·