Virginia Supreme Court strikes down Democrats’ redistricting plan, dimming party’s midterm hopes

The Virginia Supreme Court connected Friday struck down a voter-approved Democratic legislature redistricting plan, delivering different large setback to the enactment successful a nationwide conflict against Republicans for an borderline successful this year's midterm elections.

The tribunal ruled 4-3 that the state's Democratic-led legislature violated procedural requirements erstwhile it placed the law amendment connected the ballot to authorize the mid-decade redistricting. Voters narrowly approved the amendment April 21, but the court's ruling renders the results of that ballot meaningless.

Writing for the majority, Justice D. Arthur Kelsey wrote that the legislature submitted the projected law amendment to voters “in an unprecedented manner.”

“This usurpation irreparably undermines the integrity of the resulting referendum ballot and renders it null and void," helium wrote.

Democrats had hoped to triumph arsenic galore arsenic 4 further U.S. House seats nether Virginia's redrawn U.S. House representation arsenic portion of an effort to offset Republican redistricting done elsewhere astatine the urging of President Donald Trump. That ruling, combined with a caller U.S. Supreme Court determination severely weakening the Voting Rights Act, has supercharged the Republicans' legislature gerrymandering vantage heading into this year's midterm elections.

Richard Hudson, president of the National Republican Congressional Committee said the ruling was different motion of GOP momentum heading into the midterms.

"We’re connected offense, and we’re going to win,” helium said successful a statement.

A flurry of mid-decade redistricting

Legislative voting districts typically are redrawn erstwhile a decennary aft each census to relationship for colonisation changes. But Trump started an antithetic flurry of mid-decade redistricting past twelvemonth erstwhile helium encouraged Republican officials successful Texas to redraw districts successful a bid to triumph respective further U.S. House seats and clasp connected to their party's constrictive bulk successful the midterm elections.

California responded with caller voter-approved districts drawn to Democrats' advantage, and Utah's apical tribunal imposed a caller legislature representation that besides helps Democrats. Meanwhile, Republicans basal to summation from caller House districts passed successful Florida, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio and Tennessee. They could adhd adjacent much aft the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling successful the Voting Rights Act case, which has prompted immoderate different Republican states to see redrawing their maps successful clip for this year’s elections.

Virginia presently is represented successful the U.S. House by six Democrats and 5 Republicans who were elected from districts imposed by a tribunal aft a bipartisan redistricting committee failed to hold connected a representation aft the 2020 census. The caller districts could person fixed Democrats an improved accidental to triumph each but 1 of the state's 11 legislature seats.

What was successful Democrats' map

Under the Demcoratic-drawn map, 5 districts would person been anchored successful the Democratic stronghold of bluish Virginia, including 1 stretching retired similar a lobster to devour Republican-leaning agrarian areas. Revisions to 4 different districts crossed Richmond, confederate Virginia and Hampton Roads would person diluted the voting powerfulness of blimpish blocs successful those areas. And a reshaped territory successful parts of occidental Virginia would person lumped unneurotic 3 Democratic-leaning assemblage towns to offset different Republican voters.

The authorities Supreme Court’s 7 justices are appointed by the authorities legislature, which has toggled backmost and distant betwixt Democratic, Republican and divided power implicit caller years. Legal experts accidental the assemblage doesn’t person a acceptable ideological profile

The lawsuit earlier the tribunal focused not connected the signifier of the caller districts but alternatively connected the process the General Assembly utilized to authorize them.

Because the state’s redistricting committee was established by a voter-approved law amendment, lawmakers had to suggest an amendment to redraw the districts. That required support of a solution successful 2 abstracted legislative sessions, with a authorities predetermination sandwiched successful between, to spot the amendment connected the ballot.

The legislature’s archetypal support of the amendment occurred past October — portion aboriginal voting was underway but earlier it concluded connected the time of the wide election. The legislature’s 2nd ballot connected the amendment occurred aft a caller legislative league began successful January. Lawmakers besides approved a abstracted measure successful February laying retired the caller districts, taxable to elector support of the law amendment.

The arguments implicit the amendment

Judicial arguments focused connected whether the legislature’s archetypal support of the amendment came excessively late, due to the fact that aboriginal voting already had begun for the 2025 wide election.

Attorney Matthew Seligman, who defended the legislature, argued that the “election” should beryllium defined narrowly to mean the Tuesday of the wide election. In that case, the legislature’s archetypal ballot connected the redistricting amendment occurred earlier the predetermination and was constitutional, helium told judges.

An lawyer for the plaintiffs, Thomas McCarthy, argued that an “election” should beryllium interpreted to screen the full play during which radical tin formed ballots, which lasts respective weeks successful Virginia. If that’s the case, helium told justices, past the legislature’s archetypal endorsement of the redistricting amendment came excessively precocious to comply with the authorities constitution.

In January, a justice successful agrarian Tazewell County, successful southwestern Virginia, ruled that lawmakers failed to travel their ain rules for adding the redistricting amendment to a peculiar league past fall. Circuit Judge Jack Hurley Jr. besides ruled that lawmakers failed to initially o.k. the amendment earlier the nationalist began voting successful past year’s wide predetermination and that the authorities had failed to people the amendment 3 months earlier the election, arsenic required by law. As a result, helium said, the amendment is invalid and void.

The Virginia Supreme Court placed Hurley’s bid connected clasp and allowed the redistricting ballot to proceed earlier proceeding arguments connected the case.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten oregon redistributed without permission.