UK Supreme Court to rule on landmark legal challenge over legal definition of a woman

LONDON – The U.K. Supreme Court is poised to regularisation Wednesday successful a ineligible situation focusing connected the explanation of a pistillate successful a long-running quality betwixt a women’s rights radical and the Scottish government.

Five judges astatine Britain's highest tribunal are scheduled to regularisation whether a transgender idiosyncratic with a certificate that recognizes them arsenic pistillate tin beryllium regarded arsenic a pistillate nether equality laws.

While the lawsuit centers connected Scottish law, the radical bringing the challenge, For Women Scotland (FWS), has said its outcomes could person U.K.-wide consequences for sex-based rights arsenic good arsenic mundane single-sex services specified arsenic toilets and infirmary wards.

What's the lawsuit about?

The lawsuit stems from a 2018 instrumentality passed by the Scottish Parliament stating that determination should beryllium a 50% pistillate practice connected the boards of Scottish nationalist bodies. That instrumentality included transgender women successful its explanation of women.

The women's rights radical successfully challenged that law, arguing that its redefinition of “woman” went beyond parliament's powers.

Scottish officials past issued guidance stating that the explanation of “woman” included a transgender pistillate with a sex designation certificate.

FWS sought to overturn that.

“Not tying the explanation of enactment to its mean meaning means that nationalist boards could conceivably comprise of 50% men, and 50% men with certificates, yet inactive lawfully conscionable the targets for pistillate representation," the group’s manager Trina Budge said.

The situation was rejected by a tribunal successful 2022, but the radical was granted support past twelvemonth to instrumentality its lawsuit to the Supreme Court.

What are the arguments?

Aidan O’Neill, a lawyer for FWS, told the Supreme Court judges — 3 men and 2 women — that nether the Equality Act “sex” should notation to biologic enactment and arsenic understood “in ordinary, mundane language.”

“Our presumption is your sex, whether you are a antheral oregon a pistillate oregon a miss oregon a lad is determined from conception successful utero, adjacent earlier one’s birth, by one’s body,” helium said connected Tuesday. "It is an look of one’s bodily reality. It is an immutable biologic state.”

The women's rights radical counts among its supporters writer J.K. Rowling, who reportedly donated tens of thousands of pounds to backmost its work. The “Harry Potter” writer has been vocal successful arguing that the rights for trans women should not travel astatine the disbursal of those who are calved biologically female.

Opponents, including Amnesty International, said excluding transgender radical from enactment favoritism protections conflicts with quality rights.

Amnesty submitted a little successful tribunal saying it was acrophobic astir the deterioration of the rights for trans radical successful the U.K. and abroad.

“A broad argumentation of barring trans women from single-sex services is not a proportionate means to execute a morganatic aim,” the quality rights radical said.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten oregon redistributed without permission.