Trump’s Dubious Claim that Birthright Citizenship Could Still Be Overturned with Legislation

After the Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s enforcement bid seeking to extremity birthright citizenship, the president called connected Congress to extremity it done legislation, saying a “long and unwieldy” law amendment was not necessary. But law and migration instrumentality experts disagree.

These experts accidental the bulk sentiment from the Supreme Court — which interpreted the 14th Amendment arsenic providing citizenship to anyone calved successful the country, with precise constricted exceptions — indicated that a law amendment would beryllium needed.

Shortly aft the Supreme Court’s ruling connected June 30, Trump wrote connected Truth Social, “The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is excessively atrocious for our Country, but we tin easy marque it up successful Congress done Legislation, with the enactment of the President, that has present been determined during this process. No agelong and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should commencement TODAY to enactment connected ending costly and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They volition person my Complete and Total Support!”

Trump is close astir the important hurdle law amendments present. They indispensable beryllium supported by a two-thirds bulk successful some the House and Senate, and past request to beryllium ratified by three-fourths of the states.

But law scholars, and adjacent immoderate Republican supporters of ending birthright citizenship, accidental that’s present the way to extremity it.

According to the 14th Amendment, ratified successful 1868, “All persons calved oregon naturalized successful the United States, and taxable to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.”

On the archetypal time of his 2nd term, Trump issued an executive order to contradict birthright citizenship to children calved to parents successful the state unlawfully oregon who are successful the state lawfully but lone connected impermanent visas. It ne'er went into effect, though, due to the fact that little national courts blocked it.

The lawsuit Trump v. Barbara made its mode to the Supreme Court and successful the majority opinion connected the case, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: “Citizenship, past and now, was the close to person rights— to freely enactment successful our governmental community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that committedness to ‘every free-born idiosyncratic successful this land.’ … We support that committedness today.”

That includes “children calved of parents unlawfully oregon temporarily contiguous successful the United States,” Roberts wrote for the majority. “Under the Constitution,” helium said, “they are citizens astatine birth.”

According to law scholars we interviewed, that leaves nary wiggle country for doing distant with birthright citizenship done mean legislation. Legislators person been trying for years to extremity birthright citizenship for children of radical successful the state illegally, though nary measure has ever passed. Now, galore experts say, it is wide that immoderate specified authorities would beryllium struck down by the courts.

“Trump is grasping astatine straws,” Garrett Epps, a prof of signifier astatine the University of Oregon School of Law and a law expert, told america via email. “There is nary connection successful the bulk sentiment successful Barbara that suggests Congress could alteration the birthright citizenship regularisation of the Fourteenth Amendment by statute.”

While the court’s 6-3 determination struck down Trump’s enforcement order, Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred with the bulk lone successful part. He wrote successful a abstracted sentiment that helium disagreed that Trump’s bid violated the 14th Amendment. He said Congress unsocial has the authorization to “enact caller authorities establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children calved to overseas citizens unlawfully oregon temporarily successful the country.”

Although 3 justices voted against the bulk opinion, Kavanaugh’s was “the lone dependable of the 9 that raises that possibility” of reversing birthright citizenship done legislative action, Epps said.

“Nothing—nothing—in the bulk sentiment suggests that Congress has the powerfulness to bounds oregon abolish” birthright citizenship, Epps said. “Maybe—maybe—the 3 different dissenters would agree; but they bash not accidental truthful successful writing. Meanwhile, there’s nary denotation from immoderate of the 5 successful the bulk that they are basing their determination connected statutory grounds. As of today, determination are 5 votes connected this tribunal to clasp that the Citizenship Clause establishes a wide law regularisation that cannot beryllium overturned by enactment of Congress, immoderate much than the Equal Protection oregon Due Process Clauses could be.”

Muzaffar Chishti, a lawyer and elder chap astatine the Migration Policy Institute, told america via email that Trump is “wrong” to accidental birthright citizenship could beryllium reversed by legislation.

“He mislaid this 1 plain and simple!” Chishti, manager of the MPI bureau astatine the New York University School of Law, said.

“Unfortunately for the President, the bulk of Justices (5-4) did not enactment his position,” Chishti said connected the time of the ruling. “The majority, successful an extraordinarily beardown sentiment by the Chief Justice, ruled that lone a law amendment tin reinterpret the existent knowing of the 14th amendment: that each kid (with the insignificant exceptions of children calved to diplomats and force aliens) are citizens astatine birth. So, the lone mode that tin present beryllium changed aft today’s determination is either a law amendment oregon by the Supreme Court overruling today’s decision.”

Jorge Loweree of the American Immigration Council agreed.

“The Supreme Court did not accidental Congress tin extremity birthright citizenship done legislation,” Loweree told america via email. “The bulk held that the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects citizenship for astir everyone calved successful the United States, relying connected much than a period of precedent. While respective dissenting Justices argued that the Clause should beryllium interpreted much narrowly, those views did not prevail.”

“If Congress enacted a statute that conflicted with the Court’s mentation of the Fourteenth Amendment, it would look contiguous law challenges,” Loweree added. “Unless the Supreme Court changes its mentation successful a aboriginal case, Congress cannot override the Constitution by statute.”

At slightest 2 salient Republicans, some lawyers who reason birthright citizenship, besides hold it would present instrumentality a law amendent.

“This was not a determination connected procedural grounds (ie, POTUS can’t bash this done enforcement bid but Congress could legislate it); it is simply a substantive determination that says the 14th amendment requires citizenship for those calved to, among others, commencement tourists oregon those unlawfully contiguous successful the country,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis wrote connected X. “Will request either a law amendment oregon a aboriginal tribunal to overrule this.”

Sen. Mike Lee of Utah besides saw the determination arsenic a telephone to prosecute “the agelong fight” for a law amendment.

“Neither the Founding Fathers, nor the authors of the 14th Amendment, nor the millions of Americans who fought and died for their state done the ages intended to found a federation whose citizenship could truthful easy beryllium purchased, whether done commencement tourism of China’s communist enactment members oregon a immense borderline penetration enabled by faithless presidents,” Lee wrote connected X. “This is the inexpensive and cheated citizenship the Supreme Court upholds today. The agelong combat for a law amendment begins now. We indispensable explicitly exclude overseas nationals who interruption our laws, interruption our borders, oregon exploit loopholes to marque their families American citizens.”

Birth tourism refers to large women coming to the U.S. connected tourism visas successful bid to get birthright U.S. citizenship for their newborn children.

Andrew Arthur, a nonmigratory chap successful instrumentality and argumentation astatine the Center for Immigration Studies, an enactment that favors debased immigration, told america determination are “any fig of actions that Congress could instrumentality that would code the issues that the president is raising.”

For example, helium said, the authorities could restrict the nonimmigrant introduction of large women, ace down connected commencement tourism, oregon bounds the quality of birthright citizens to petition for household members to beryllium admitted to the U.S.

“Not to accidental that immoderate of those are bully oregon atrocious ideas (except for cracking down connected birthright tourism, which astir hold with)– but they are steps Congress could take,” Arthur said.

As we person written, determination is nary nonstop authorities information connected the scope of commencement tourism successful the U.S., though the Center for Immigration Studies estimates it could beryllium implicit 20,000 births per year. And it is against the instrumentality for those who purposely alteration it. There person been immoderate high-profile arrests of radical accused of moving commencement tourism operations.

“There are means, abbreviated of tampering with the Constitution, to tackle what is without uncertainty migration fraud and a misuse of the migration system,” Michelle Mittelstadt, manager of communications for the Migration Policy Institute, told us, referring to cracking down connected commencement tourism. In fact, she said, the Trump medication has already taken immoderate steps.

Arthur, of the Center for Immigration Studies, besides believes it whitethorn inactive beryllium imaginable for Congress to constrictive the explanation of who would beryllium eligible for birthright citizenship.

But Samuel Breidbart, counsel successful the Democracy Program astatine the Brennan Center for Justice, said immoderate specified narrowing of who would suffice for birthright citizenship would not basal unless a aboriginal Supreme Court reversed its opinion.

“There are 5 votes that said firmly, unequivocally that birthright citizenship is portion of the Constitution, and that’s the law,” Breidbart said. “Now, is it existent that a 5-4 result mightiness beryllium an invitation to the blimpish ineligible question to support trying? I’m definite that’s however they’re reasoning astir this. I’m definite that they’re reasoning that they tin prosecute aboriginal litigation. … But close present the instrumentality is arsenic it has ever been, that there’s birthright citizenship for each who are calved here, and we necessitate a law amendment to alteration that. What the tribunal did yesterday did not unfastened the doorway to Congress legislating.”

Evelyn Cruz, a prof and manager of the migration session astatine Arizona State University’s instrumentality school, told america via email that Kavanaugh’s proposition that Congress could amend who is eligible for birthright citizenship “stands connected bladed ice.”

But determination whitethorn beryllium governmental summation to specified an effort, she said.

“Whether Justice Kavanaugh’s proposition is legally dependable oregon not, the information that helium has opened the doorway to a imaginable mode for Congress to delineate entree to birthright citizenship, adjacent if the authorities is aboriginal ruled unconstitutional, leaves the birthright citizenship contented viable for governmental purposes,” contempt the court’s unequivocal decision, Cruz said.

---

Editor’s note: FactCheck.org does not judge advertising. We trust connected grants and idiosyncratic donations from radical similar you. Please see a donation. Credit paper donations whitethorn beryllium made through our “Donate” page. If you similar to springiness by check, nonstop to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, P.O. Box 58100, Philadelphia, PA 19102.   

The station Trump’s Dubious Claim that Birthright Citizenship Could Still Be Overturned with Legislation appeared archetypal connected FactCheck.org.