Trump admin accuses judge in golf course case of 'error' and criticizes her decisions while asking court to rule against plaintiffs on preliminary injunction request

Main: President Donald Trump holds scissors to chopped the ribbon during the opening ceremonial for Trump International Golf Links adjacent Aberdeen, Scotland Tuesday, July 29, 2025 (AP Photo/Alastair Grant). Left inset: U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes pictured June 2022 during her confirmation hearings (Sen. Dick Durbin/YouTube).

The Trump administration connected Friday implored a national justice to cull arguments made by the plaintiffs successful a suit implicit operation and tree-clearing astatine a nationalist play people successful Washington, D.C.

At the aforesaid time, the government's 44-page question successful opposition makes respective swipes astatine the judge's decisions, theories and actions.

In the months-old case, golfers and an biology advocacy radical sued, alleging President Donald Trump intended to "destroy East Potomac Golf Course and to physique successful its spot a championship-style play people suitable for nonrecreational tournaments."

Early on, U.S. District Judge Ana C. Reyes, a Joe Biden appointee, resisted entering preliminary alleviation for the plaintiffs, telling the parties that she did "not privation to beryllium the overseer of Parks and Rec."

In precocious September, the authorities hired a contractor to oversee astatine slightest portion of what the plaintiffs had been informing about.

In aboriginal October, the Department of the Interior (DOI) removed immoderate 529 trees, earning the judge's ire, arsenic Law&Crime previously reported. Reyes accused Department of Justice attorneys of doing "your implicit worst" and angrily criticized the government.

"Breakneck velocity to wide trees that posed nary harm," the justice opined successful a written order. "The reason? Disputed. The budget? Unclear. The biology impact? Unstudied. The urgency? None. Next steps: bulldoze hundreds more."

Feeling somewhat vindicated, the plaintiffs filed an exigency question for a impermanent restraining bid (TRO) connected Oct. 11, which the tribunal rapidly granted. On Wednesday, the plaintiffs filed for a preliminary injunction, arguing that their warnings were prescient.

"From the infinitesimal Plaintiffs filed this suit successful February, Defendants person been saying 1 happening and doing another: insisting that determination is nary program to destruct East Potomac Golf Course, but each the portion implementing that program piecemeal," the question begins. "Now Defendants' implementation of that program has indisputably begun inflicting irreversible harm to East Potomac Golf Course."

In response, the Trump medication says the plaintiffs deficiency lasting and insists determination is nary program to bash what the plaintiffs accidental is happening.

"Plaintiffs' mentation of lasting is foreclosed by the Supreme Court," the government's question begins. "And they cannot gin up a last bureau enactment from amorphous events that person not yet materialized into a concrete, last decision."

After those introductory sentences, the DOJ launches into a lengthy bid of complaints astir Reyes' enactment connected the lawsuit truthful far.

More Law&Crime coverage: 'You did not bash your best': 'Furious' justice says Trump DOJ lawyers 'cost' authorities 'all its credibility' successful play people case, floats contempt

"Despite lacking jurisdiction, this Court has present violated bedrock separation of powers principles by demanding that high-ranking Department of the Interior officials beryllium taxable to wide-ranging cross-examination without immoderate showing of exceptional circumstances," the question goes on.

To perceive the authorities archer it, the plaintiffs person already exhausted their deposition "bite astatine the apple" due to the fact that they antecedently cross-examined DOI officials "on matters of small to nary relevance to the TRO proceedings earlier the Court."

The DOJ says the further find granted to the plaintiffs is an "error" by the justice "compounded" by different errors she made.

The absorption question lists those errors arsenic the authorities sees them:

On October 13, 2026, the Court entered a TRO based connected a assertion that Plaintiffs did not make, against an bureau enactment they did not challenge, connected a mentation of harm and causation they did not present. The bid prohibits the National Park Service ("NPS") from "fell[ing] immoderate further trees connected the East Potomac Golf Course," an NPS-managed installation wrong East Potomac Park.

As for the lasting argument, the authorities says the plaintiffs simply "dislike the projected changes" due to the fact that they "enjoy the play people arsenic it is, and bash not privation for it to change."

That dislike, the question argues, is "not a basis" to bring a suit due to the fact that it does not "establish a factual and particularized injury."

The authorities goes connected to reason the plaintiffs reason a "yet-to-be-finalized connection to redesign and renovate" the play course.

"Their complaint, adjacent arsenic amended, inactive relies upon speculation astir what the Proposal volition specifically propose, however it volition beryllium implemented and what it volition dwell of successful last form, and how, if astatine all, the Proposal oregon its last implementation mightiness origin them wounded successful the future," the question continues.

But, the authorities insists, the histrion contented is wholly separate.

"Plaintiffs' ailment obscurity alleges that the histrion removal that occurred connected October 10th, and would person continued but for this Court's intervention, is adjacent portion of the Proposal to statesman with," the question goes on. "The grounds demonstrates that it is not."

The station Trump admin accuses justice successful play people lawsuit of 'error' and criticizes her decisions portion asking tribunal to regularisation against plaintiffs connected preliminary injunction request archetypal appeared connected Law & Crime.