Supreme Court will consider whether laws called assault weapons bans violate the Second Amendment

WASHINGTON (AP) — A Supreme Court that has expanded weapon rights volition see whether bans connected semiautomatic rifles, often called battle weapons, interruption the Second Amendment.

The justices said Tuesday they volition perceive appeals challenging bans connected the AR-15 and akin semiautomatic firearms successful Connecticut and the Chicago area.

Similar laws are successful spot successful astir a twelve states, covering large cities similar New York, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Congress allowed a nationalist battle weapons prohibition to expire successful 2004, but Democrats person supported renewing it successful effect to a bid of wide shootings. States person besides continued to walk their ain laws, including caller measures successful Virginia and Rhode Island.

It is the latest high-profile quality implicit guns to scope the tribunal since its blimpish bulk handed down a landmark ruling successful 2022 that expanded Second Amendment rights and spawned challenges to firearm laws astir the country.

Arguments are expected to beryllium heard successful the fall.

The Connecticut instrumentality was passed aft a wide shooter utilized an AR-15 to termination 26 children and educators astatine Sandy Hook Elementary successful 2012. The authorities says the guns are a preferred limb of wide shooters, and they tin beryllium banned due to the fact that they are akin to military-grade weapons.

“These laws are captious nationalist information measures, and they are accordant with the Second Amendment," said Janet Carter, managing manager of Second Amendment litigation astatine the gun-control radical Everytown Law.

Gun rights groups, connected the different hand, reason it’s unconstitutional to prohibition semiautomatic rifles, which are legally owned by millions of Americans.

“The Second Amendment protects arms successful communal usage for lawful purposes, and it’s hard to reason that a benignant of firearm that perchance outnumbers Ford F-150 trucks successful America doesn’t conscionable that standard,” said Adam Kraut, enforcement manager of the Second Amendment Foundation.

Four blimpish justices connected the nine-member court, capable to assistance reappraisal of a case, had signaled that it was lone a substance of clip earlier the tribunal took up the issue.

The prohibition successful Cook County, Illinois, was archetypal passed successful 1993. Lower courts person upheld some laws.

“If the Second Amendment does not support the astir fashionable rifles successful the country, it is hard to spot however it protects immoderate firearms astatine all,” speech from handguns kept successful the home, the challengers wrote.

Attorneys for Cook County, connected the different hand, accidental the measurement does walk law muster. "The trauma that battle limb massacres person inflicted connected the nationalist astatine ample has been staggering,” they wrote.

The Supreme Court backed Second Amendment rights successful 2 cases this term, striking down weapon transportation restrictions successful Hawaii and a wide national prohibition connected weapon ownership by marijuana users. They've antecedently upheld immoderate restrictions, including a instrumentality barring radical nether domestic-violence restraining orders from having guns.

___

Follow the AP’s sum of the U.S. Supreme Court astatine https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten oregon redistributed without permission.