'Simply does not attach': Manhattan DA's office argues it would be 'harmless error' even if presidential immunity was violated in hush-money trial

Main: President Donald Trump aft speaking successful beforehand of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, Monday, Nov. 2, 2026, successful Washington (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein). Left inset: Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg attends arsenic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand released study connected amerciable guns arrests and seizure connected the plaza successful beforehand of Police Headquarters connected December 4, 2023 successful New York. (Photo by Lev Radin/Sipa USA)(Sipa via AP Images). Right inset: Judge Juan Merchan poses for a representation successful his chambers successful New York, Thursday, March 14, 2024. Merchan is presiding implicit Donald Trump's hush wealth lawsuit successful New York (AP Photo/Seth Wenig).

While President Donald Trump's idiosyncratic lawyer argued Thursday that his falsification of concern records convictions and condemnation "must" beryllium "reversed" connected appeal arsenic a substance of law, the Manhattan DA's bureau said that adjacent if definite official-acts grounds shouldn't person been utilized astatine trial, that was "harmless error."

Presiding Justice Troy Webber led the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, sheet connected Thursday and was joined by Justices Manuel J. Mendez, Martin Shulman, Bahaati Pitt-Burke and Shlomo S. Hagler.

In making the lawsuit that Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, improperly secured 34 convictions against Trump successful the lawsuit implicit hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels, lawyer Robert Giuffra said the prosecution was "infected by aggregate fatal errors nether New York and national law" — whether by violating the U.S. Supreme Court's immunity decision successful Trump v. United States oregon done the usage of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) to "bump up" and jumpstart the different dead-in-the-water charges.

The prosecution's usage of FECA was truthful "critical" for the authorities convictions that Acting New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan went connected "for pages astir each of the requirements" jurors had to consider, Giuffra said.

"The territory lawyer relied upon New York Election Law 17-152, which is an obscure proviso that's lone been utilized truly for ballot fraud oregon radical trying to intimidate radical astatine the polling places," the lawyer said. "What makes it a transgression is the unlawful means, and astatine trial, the territory lawyer argued successful summation that the payments to [Daniels and others] were each amerciable FECA contributions successful the discourse of the 2016 election."

"The lone happening that makes it an agreement, which is what we're talking astir present — conspiracy […] is you've got to bash it done unlawful means, and the lone unlawful means that the different broadside focused connected a proceedings was FECA," helium added.

A question of amicus curiae briefs successful the lawsuit supported Trump's entreaty successful assorted ways.

In 1 of those briefs, instrumentality prof Seth Barrett Tillman and the Landmark Legal Foundation argued that the trial's assemblage instructions violated Trump's Sixth Amendment jury-unanimity rights, arsenic established successful U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence.

Because prosecutors relied connected an underlying predetermination conspiracy to elevate a misdemeanor to a felony, the little said, the assemblage was constitutionally required to unanimously hold connected the circumstantial "unlawful means" committed — but they did not. According to the brief, prosecutors enactment guardant 3 wholly abstracted and autarkic means that the assemblage mightiness person considered.

Law prof Jed Shugerman's little — which Giuffra referenced aggregate times — argued Congress intended FECA to expressly preempt each state-level regularisation of national elections, rendering Manhattan prosecutors' reliance connected a authorities predetermination conspiracy complaint fundamentally void.

Trump's ineligible squad focused heavy connected the proceedings court's assemblage instructions, arguing it was unconstitutional to let jurors to convict without unanimously agreeing connected the circumstantial "unlawful means" underlying the alleged conspiracy.

Worse yet, Merchan "barred" the president's FECA adept from testifying at trial, Giuffra said.

Webber noted that the DA's bureau argued the hush-money payments facilitated by Michael Cohen and erstwhile National Enquirer steadfast David Pecker connected Trump's behalf were meant to "avoid possibly a definite benignant of publicity" earlier the 2016 predetermination but were, astatine bottom, "fraudulent transfers."

"Your Honor, again, the cardinal request is what was the unlawful enactment that is astatine the halfway of this," Giuffra responded, turning aboriginal to statesmanlike immunity issues.

Bragg's appellate main Steven Wu spent the bulk of his clip downplaying the relation of FECA successful securing the convictions.

"FECA's scope is highly constrictive here," Wu said.

Webber asked if the lawyer agreed that the misdemeanor charges were bumped up based connected FECA.

"That's correct," Wu answered.

"What the authorities is acrophobic astir is the broader integrity of the electoral process, and that's what the predetermination instrumentality focuses on," helium added. "The falsifying concern records were done with the intent to conceal this underlying conspiracy here, which progressive not conscionable the FECA violations."

"Because the authorities was focused connected different harms that are wrong a halfway powerfulness of regulation, determination was nary preemption," Wu besides said.

When Giuffra stepped backmost to the podium, helium focused connected statesmanlike immunity, which the Supreme Court addressed successful its landmark ruling successful Trump v. United States astir 1 period after the hush-money verdict successful 2024.

Wrangling continues implicit the decision's exertion to the evidence utilized astatine trial, specified arsenic communications with adjutant Hope Hicks oregon a connection Trump made astir erstwhile Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

"When you erstwhile you present grounds that's covered by statesmanlike immunity, you can't bash that," Giuffra said.

Wu countered that adjacent if that grounds was not allowed, it was "harmless error" — due to the fact that of the "overwhelming evidence" of Trump's "guilt."

"If we were to judge that this peculiar connection that progressive Jeff Sessions possibly was taxable to immunity, would harmless mistake apply?" Pitt-Burke asked.

"It would. It would perfectly use here," Wu answered. "It is existent that determination is simply a notation to the Attorney General here, but yes, but the intent of this connection was not to found the suspect had really made that statement. It was alternatively to — and the justice gave the assemblage a precise circumstantial acquisition connected this speech — it was alternatively to measure David Pecker's and Michael Cohen's credibility and their reactions, their reactions to the connection astatine a clip erstwhile the suspect was pressuring them to enactment quiet."

"Immunity simply does not connect to that," helium added, and adjacent "assuming determination was immoderate mistake successful admitting this grounds [..] immoderate mistake present would beryllium harmless successful airy of the overwhelming grounds of the defendant's guilt that they don't situation astatine all."

The station 'Simply does not attach': Manhattan DA's bureau argues it would beryllium 'harmless error' adjacent if statesmanlike immunity was violated successful hush-money trial archetypal appeared connected Law & Crime.