‘Procedurally erroneous’: Trump admin claims court order to reveal ‘plan’ for mass firings could cause ’embarrassment’

The Trump administration is asking a national justice successful California to reconsider an order that would unit it to disclose its program for wide firings crossed aggregate agencies arsenic portion of the president’s effort to gut the national workforce, claiming that specified “Agency Reductions successful Force and Reorganization Plans” (ARRPs) incorporate privileged accusation that could, among different things, origin “embarrassment” oregon “annoyance” for the government.

The underlying litigation challenges President Donald Trump‘s Feb. 11, 2025, enforcement order: “Implementing The President’s ‘Department Of Government Efficiency’ Workforce Optimization Initiative.” The bid purports to commence a “critical translation of the Federal bureaucracy” by “eliminating waste, bloat, and insularity.” Under the plan, administrative bureau heads would beryllium required to “initiate large-scale reductions successful force” (RIFs), oregon monolithic layoffs, successful work of the extremity to restructure the government.

U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, a Bill Clinton appointee, granted a petition from a conjugation of labour unions, nonprofit groups, and municipalities to artifact the planned firings via a impermanent retraining order. The justice besides issued a “Disclosure Order” directing that ARRPs submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) beryllium provided to the tribunal by Tuesday.

The medication connected Sunday sought to person Illston enactment a clasp connected the disclosure bid anterior to the impending deadline.

“The Court should either assistance Defendants a protective bid from the work to disclose the ARRPs oregon reconsider the Disclosure Order due to the fact that the ARRPs are privileged pre-decisional and deliberative bureau readying documents,” the 14-page filing states. “They besides incorporate significant, highly delicate accusation the disclosure of which volition irreparably harm OPM, OMB, and the Defendant Agencies, harm that cannot beryllium undone erstwhile the documents are disclosed. Defendants taxable that the Court’s assistance of this bonzer alleviation was some substantively and procedurally erroneous.”

Love existent crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life transgression stories delivered close to your inbox.

Attorneys for the Department of Justice besides asserted that halting disclosure of the ARRPs would not irreparably harm the plaintiffs, claiming that specified documents are “simply irrelevant to aboriginal proceedings successful this Court” and that the existent program was “subject to alteration astatine immoderate moment.”

The plaintiffs successful the lawsuit alleged that the Trump administration’s planned firings implicated assorted separation of powerfulness issues, including the usurpation of Congress’ relation successful wide-ranging authorities overhauls.

“It is the prerogative of presidents to prosecute caller argumentation priorities and to imprint their stamp connected the national government,” Illston wrote successful her Friday order. “But to marque large-scale overhauls of national agencies, immoderate president indispensable enlist the assistance of his co-equal subdivision and partner, the Congress.”

The tribunal expressed terrible misgivings with however the Trump medication tried to execute its aims.

One of the cardinal problems, Illston observed, was tasking 3 agencies and offices — the OPM, the OMB, and the alleged Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — with astir of the dense lifting. In the litigation, the plaintiffs azygous retired circumstantial memos by OPM and OMB and the widely-publicized — and often self-trumpeted — actions undertaken by DOGE arsenic “unconstitutional and unlawful orders” arsenic portion of what they referred to arsenic Trump’s “radical transformation.”

The tribunal finds that neither OPM nor OMB person immoderate statutory authorization to terminate bureau employees — speech from their ain interior employees — “or to bid different agencies to downsize” oregon to restructure different agencies. And, arsenic acold arsenic the Elon Musk-led DOGE is concerned, the justice is withering: “As plaintiffs rightly note, DOGE ‘has nary statutory authorization astatine all.'”

“In sum, nary statute gives OPM, OMB, oregon DOGE the authorization to nonstop different national agencies to prosecute successful large-scale terminations, restructuring, oregon elimination of itself,” Illston wrote. “Such enactment is acold extracurricular the bounds of immoderate authorization that Congress vested successful OPM oregon OMB, and, arsenic noted, DOGE has nary statutory authorization whatsoever.”

Colin Kalmbacher contributed to this report.