‘Possible violation of his due process rights’: Another federal judge bars the Trump admin from deportation under Alien Enemies Act

3 hours ago 5

Donald Trump successful  the Oval Office.

President Donald Trump speaks to reporters earlier signing an enforcement bid successful the Oval Office of the White House successful Washington, Monday, March 31, 2025 (Pool via AP).

A national justice successful California blocked the Trump medication from deporting a Venezuelan antheral to a notorious enactment situation successful El Salvador nether an 18th-century wartime power unless the authorities provides him with astatine slightest two-week announcement of his removal.

U.S. District Judge Sunshine S. Sykes connected Friday appeared skeptical astir assertions from the Justice Department that the petitioner would beryllium fixed the accidental to exercise his owed process rights. According to the 8-page order, the petitioner, Yostin Sleiker Gutierrez-Contreras, came to the U.S. successful May 2024 and was enrolled successful the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) biometric reporting database. In September 2024, Gutierrez-Contreras reported to ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations successful San Bernardino, California, wherever authorities photographed and cataloged his tattoos.

Based connected the photographs of his tattoos, the authorities concluded that helium “had a imaginable affiliation with the Venezuelan pack Tren de Aragua (TdA), which President Donald Trump proclaimed arsenic an invading unit nether the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 (AEA) successful March. Gutierrez-Contreras “vigorously dispute[ed] immoderate TdA affiliation” and was allowed to stay successful the state nether supervision.

Despite allegedly maintaining “perfect compliance” with his supervision, Gutierrez-Contreras connected March 19 was taken into custody by the government. A justice ordered him released with pretrial conditions connected March 26, but ICE officials instantly took him backmost into custody. On April 12, Gutierrez-Contreras’ counsel learned that the authorities was readying connected removing him to El Salvador nether the AEA.

Two days later, Gutierrez-Contreras was moved from California to a detention installation successful Texas, which is “the aforesaid installation from which the authorities placed respective Venezuelans connected buses successful an evident effort to region them to El Salvador nether the AEA until they were stopped by a Supreme Court Order,” Sykes wrote.

The Trump medication argued that Gutierrez-Contreras was not entitled to a impermanent restraining bid barring his removal nether the AEA due to the fact that helium is not astatine “imminent risk” of summary removal and truthful cannot show helium is facing “irreparable harm.”

In addition, the authorities claims that “Petitioner is lone entitled to ‘reasonable notice’ anterior to removal nether the AEA alternatively than the fourteen days’ announcement the TRO seeks, and the Court does not person jurisdiction to enjoin the government’s transportation from Adelanto, California and/or Desert View Annex.”

Sykes rejected the government’s arguments, reasoning that it would apt interruption the petitioner’s law rights. She wrote that Gutierrez-Contreras’s petition “raises the superior question whether his removal nether the AEA without announcement and an accidental to situation the removal is simply a usurpation of his rights nether the Due Process Clause.”

She besides indicated that, fixed the administration’s caller history, she was not inclined to springiness the authorities the payment of the uncertainty successful the instant lawsuit without further details.

“While Respondents situation the request of fourteen days’ announcement arsenic unnecessary fixed that Petitioner, and others likewise situated, are solely entitled to ‘reasonable notice’ nether J.G.G., Respondents neglect to articulate specifically what they judge is capable to comply with the request for ‘reasonable notice’ successful their briefing and astatine the proceeding connected this Petition,” the bid states. “This Court cannot, and volition not, trust connected vague and undefined statements astir announcement procedures erstwhile an individual’s owed process rights are implicated. Therefore, the Court holds that Petitioner’s TRO raises a superior question related to the imaginable usurpation of his owed process rights if helium is removed nether the AEA without fourteen days’ announcement and an accidental to situation the removal.”

Sykes, a Joe Biden appointee, besides rejected the government’s assertion that Gutierrez-Contreras was not facing imminent harm due to the fact that helium is presently covered by an administrative enactment issued successful a abstracted case, saying they “do not presently expect to remove” him nether the AEA (emphasis successful original). Sykes noted that the authorities is presently attempting to “dissolve oregon limit” that stay, which could “lead to [Gutierrez-Contreras’] removal nether the AEA without an accidental to workout his owed process rights.”

“Respondents are ordered to supply fourteen days’ announcement to Petitioner and his counsel, successful writing, anterior to attempting to remove, deport, oregon expel him retired of the United States nether the Alien Enemies Act oregon immoderate ineligible authorization different than the Immigration and Nationality Act. Respondents are enjoined and barred from removing Petitioner nether the Alien Enemies Act oregon immoderate ineligible authorization different than the Immigration and Nationality Act without archetypal providing specified notice,” Sykes concluded.

Her bid volition stay successful effect until May 10.

Love existent crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life transgression stories delivered close to your inbox.

Read Entire Article