Politicians Say Glyphosate Weedkiller Causes Cancer But Evidence Not Clear-Cut

Following an enforcement bid from the Trump medication that promotes accumulation of glyphosate, immoderate Democrats person claimed that the herbicide causes cancer. The science, however, is nuanced. While determination is immoderate grounds linking glyphosate to cancers successful laboratory animals oregon to the humor crab non-Hodgkin lymphoma successful cultivation workers, the findings person been inconsistent.

Regulatory agencies astir the world, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, person concluded glyphosate is unlikely to pose carcinogenic risks.

In a Feb. 18 executive order, President Donald Trump promoted accumulation of glyphosate-based herbicides — originated successful 1974 by Monsanto arsenic the weedkiller Roundup — arsenic indispensable for nationalist security. The determination was wide viewed arsenic antagonistic to the Make America Healthy Again, oregon MAHA, movement, which mostly opposes pesticides, and prominently glyphosate. Bayer, which acquired Monsanto successful 2018, is the only company that makes glyphosate successful the U.S., though determination are besides imported generic versions.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the de facto MAHA leader, has long said that glyphosate causes cancer, though helium defended the enforcement order.

Democrats rapidly noted the contradiction — and proceeded to marque claims of their ain astir glyphosate.

“This enforcement bid is simply a slap successful the look to the thousands of Americans who person gotten crab from glyphosate,” Sen. Cory Booker, a Democrat from New Jersey, said successful a Feb. 19 statement. 

Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts, meanwhile, brought up glyphosate during the Feb. 25 confirmation hearing for the surgeon wide nominee, stating that Trump is “siding with the chemic manufacturing institution that is, successful fact, causing the cancers.”

Even arsenic helium defended Trump’s action, Kennedy has continued to indicate that glyphosate is dangerous. In a Feb. 27 quality connected the “Joe Rogan Experience,” for example, helium mentioned the nexus to NHL, the humor crab recovered successful immoderate but not different studies of radical who use glyphosate.

Other Republicans, specified arsenic Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, person besides responded, though she did not marque arsenic beardown of a assertion astir cancer, saying lone that glyphosate “has been linked” to cancer.

“Glyphosate and different pesticides don’t beryllium connected our nutrient oregon successful our children’s bodies,” she wrote successful a March 8 post connected X. “We are systematically poisoning ourselves.”

There is small to suggest glyphosate causes crab successful the hint amounts contiguous successful food. Some studies person identified associations betwixt glyphosate vulnerability and cancer, either successful humans who utilized the herbicide oregon successful animals exposed successful the lab. But the findings person been inconsistent, and researchers person travel to differing conclusions astir the wide evidence.

Results from a ample National Institutes of Health study assessing vulnerability in agricultural workers, published successful 2017, did not find an relation betwixt glyphosate and NHL oregon different cancers. This deficiency of a factual transportation has led galore regulatory agencies to reason glyphosate is improbable to origin cancer.

At the aforesaid time, a wide cited 2015 report from the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research connected Cancer deemed glyphosate “probably carcinogenic to humans,” based connected laboratory carnal information and “limited” real-world grounds linking glyphosate to crab successful humans.

“The wide representation with glyphosate is messy,” David Eastmond, a prof emeritus astatine the University of California, Riverside, who studied familial toxicology and chemic carcinogenesis, told us. He served connected a 2016 committee of the WHO and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations that found human dietary glyphosate vulnerability was improbable to origin cancer. “The quality studies are messy, the carnal studies are messy, the mechanistic studies are messy. And truthful wrong that messiness, you effort and gully conclusions, and antithetic radical construe that successful antithetic ways.”

Below, we volition locomotion done the evidence about glyphosate that regulators and others have assessed, arsenic good arsenic much caller grounds being considered.

Widespread Exposure, But Little Agreement connected Risks

Glyphosate-based herbicides are the astir commonly utilized weedkillers successful the world. As such, wide swaths of radical travel into astatine slightest immoderate interaction with them.

Monitoring by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has found that astir radical person immoderate detectable glyphosate successful their urine, though researchers from the bureau person noted that this connected its ain “does not mean that glyphosate causes illness oregon adverse effects.” Glyphosate does not importantly physique up successful the assemblage and is rapidly cleared.

Agricultural workers are apt to person the highest exposures to glyphosate. It tin besides beryllium found successful hint amounts successful a assortment of foods, peculiarly grains and legumes. People living adjacent fields portion they are being sprayed person been recovered to person elevated levels successful their urine compared with those surviving farther away.

In summation to being utilized connected farms, glyphosate-based herbicides were historically sold for residential use, though opening successful 2023 Bayer has sold new products that see herbicides different than glyphosate, citing the request to “further trim aboriginal litigation risk.”

Despite specified litigation, it’s unclear what interaction vulnerability to glyphosate-based herbicides — designed to interfere with a cardinal pathway shared by plants and immoderate microbes but not humans — has connected radical and astatine what level.

Glyphosate is not precise acutely toxic. Scientists can test the acute toxicity of a chemic by feeding it to rodents and measuring the dose astatine which fractional of the animals person died. It takes much than 4,000 milligrams of glyphosate per kilogram of assemblage value to termination fractional of rats; this means glyphosate is less acutely toxic than array salt. However, for cancer, scientists are funny successful semipermanent effects.

Some researchers accidental the grounds wide does bespeak glyphosate tin origin cancer. “Glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) harm quality wellness and tin origin cancer,” a radical of 50 physicians, scientists and others — including the MAHA activist Kelly Ryerson — wrote successful a March 27 statement. “The broad grounds supports this conclusion, with the strongest epidemiological grounds linking vulnerability to accrued hazard of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a crab of the lymphatic system.” The connection followed a symposium connected the wellness effects of glyphosate held astatine the University of Washington, which brought together world and authorities researchers, consultants, lawyers, and representatives from nonprofit organizations.

Others person been little convinced, including, arsenic we person said, regulators successful a assortment of regions and countries, including Canada, Japan and the European Union. Some epidemiologists and wellness communicators person pointed retired that immoderate crab risks successful rodents person mostly been shown astatine doses higher than a idiosyncratic typically would beryllium exposed to via their diet, portion allowing that determination whitethorn beryllium concerns for radical with much utmost exposures. And arsenic we person said, a large, rigorous epidemiological survey successful humans did not amusement an relation betwixt glyphosate and cancer.

Adding complexity to this debate, determination is simply a agelong past of concern implicit the power Monsanto whitethorn person exerted implicit the technological lit connected its product’s safety. (Bayer acquired Monsanto successful 2018.) In December, a diary retracted a 2000 reappraisal insubstantial connected glyphosate’s information due to the fact that a Monsanto worker had suggested successful an interior email that it was ghostwritten.

A Dec. 4 statement from Bayer said that Monsanto’s relation successful the 2000 insubstantial “did not emergence to the level of authorship and was appropriately disclosed successful the acknowledgments.” In a connection shared with america via email, a Bayer spokesperson emphasized the information and extended investigating of the company’s glyphosate-based products: “The information is that nary wellness regulator anyplace successful the satellite has ever recovered glyphosate to airs a menace to quality health.”

Meanwhile, pursuing the 2015 designation of glyphosate arsenic “probably carcinogenic” by the WHO’s International Agency for Research connected Cancer, radical with NHL, moving with lawyers including Kennedy, brought thousands of lawsuits against Bayer alleging harm from Roundup. (An adjutant for Booker, the legislator from New Jersey, told america via email that the “estimate that thousands of Americans person gotten crab from glyphosate is supported by the lawsuits brought by thousands of radical successful the United States who developed crab aft using glyphosate-based herbicides.”)

Bayer connected Feb. 17 proposed a $7.25 cardinal colony of existent and aboriginal cases. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court volition perceive arguments this period implicit whether radical tin bring cases against Bayer nether authorities instrumentality alleging nonaccomplishment to pass astir harms connected the labels for glyphosate-containing products. (The Trump administration filed a Dec. 1 amicus little supporting Bayer’s position.) Advocacy groups person besides challenged the EPA’s conclusions. The EPA is supposed to contented a revised determination by October.

“This year, EPA volition undertake a comprehensive, transparent, and rigorous technological reappraisal of glyphosate to measure its usage and guarantee decisions are afloat aligned with the champion disposable subject arsenic good arsenic quality wellness and biology protections,” an EPA spokesperson told america via email.

The glyphosate litigation has brought successful scientists to service arsenic expert witnesses for some sides.

“We each person biases to immoderate degree, but immoderate are influenced by outer factors,” Eastmond said. He brought up stories astir Monsanto’s ghostwriting, arsenic good arsenic the conflicts that tin travel from testifying arsenic an adept witness. “If you’re moving connected 1 broadside oregon the other, you thin to survey and absorption probe to enactment that constituent of view,” helium said. He added that helium is not alert of conflicts of involvement connected his part.

Another imaginable mentation for varying conclusions betwixt IARC and pesticide regulators is that the groups had antithetic procedures and were assessing antithetic questions. IARC was assessing whether glyphosate is simply a hazard — i.e., whether it has the theoretical quality to origin harm. Some different groups were assessing glyphosate’s risk, oregon however apt glyphosate is to beryllium causing harm nether definite circumstances, specified arsenic nether emblematic exposures.

For example, the 2016 committee from the WHO and U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization that assessed glyphosate was tasked with determining whether dietary exposures from precise debased levels of pesticide residues came with crab risk, which is antithetic from the question of whether immoderate precise precocious level of vulnerability could cancer. Regulators besides thin to measure hazard nether realistic levels of exposure.

However, a look astatine antithetic groups’ and scientists’ arguments besides reveals much cardinal disagreements connected however to construe the science, and aggregate situations wherever evaluating carcinogenicity is not cut-and-dried.

Inconsistent Evidence successful Humans

The disposable studies successful humans travel to differing conclusions astir whether glyphosate is associated with crab successful radical who use the herbicide. Meanwhile, determination isn’t grounds successful humans that low-level exposures successful nutrient are associated with cancer. It is challenging to survey whether glyphosate causes crab successful humans some due to the fact that crab takes galore years to make and due to the fact that it is tricky to measure however overmuch of the herbicide radical person been exposed to implicit a agelong of time.

At the clip that IARC assessed the quality grounds of glyphosate’s carcinogenicity arsenic “limited,” there were half a dozen studies assessing glyphosate and NHL successful humans, Laura Beane Freeman, an epidemiologist astatine the National Cancer Institute, explained during a March 25 presumption astatine the Seattle Glyphosate Symposium. “Most, but not all, of the studies had immoderate grounds of an relation with non-Hodgkin lymphoma overall,” she said. “And I’m utilizing that word loosely. It doesn’t needfully mean statistical significance, it conscionable means immoderate grounds of a affirmative association.”

The studies that initially raised concerns were case-control studies. This benignant of survey identifies radical who developed a benignant of crab successful a population, arsenic good arsenic controls from the aforesaid colonisation who did not person cancer, and past assesses their vulnerability successful retrospect. The studies relied connected asking participants oregon their household members astir past glyphosate exposure.

In a review of the grounds published successful 2017, the EPA pointed retired that not each of the studies took into relationship whether radical were exposed to different pesticides, which could person had their ain wellness effects, and that galore studies had tiny illustration sizes. “In epidemiological studies, determination was nary grounds of an relation betwixt glyphosate vulnerability and galore crab outcomes; however, owed to conflicting results and assorted limitations identified successful studies investigating NHL, a decision regarding the relation betwixt glyphosate vulnerability and hazard of NHL cannot beryllium determined based connected the disposable data,” the bureau reappraisal concluded.

The Agricultural Health Study is simply a prospective cohort survey that enrolled licensed pesticide applicators and has followed them for galore years. An vantage of this benignant of forward-looking survey is that people’s estimates of however overmuch pesticide they utilized cannot beryllium biased by knowing whether they aboriginal went connected to make cancer, dissimilar successful studies that inquire radical with crab to look backmost astatine their past exposures. In addition, it is easier for this benignant of survey to look astatine a greater assortment of crab types.

A 2005 analysis of the survey did not find an relation betwixt glyphosate and cancer. A 2018 updated analysis of the much than 54,000 participants besides recovered nary relation betwixt glyphosate usage and immoderate crab type. (For acute myeloid leukemia, determination was a numerically higher fig of cases successful farmers with the highest exposures, but the effect was not statistically significant.)

For some, the antagonistic results successful the AHS are convincing, peculiarly fixed the information that glyphosate usage has accrued since it came to marketplace successful the 1970s but NHL has somewhat fallen wide since its highest successful 2007. “The strongest survey to day successful my knowing is the Agricultural Health Study,” Eastmond said. “They conscionable didn’t spot immoderate evidence” for cancer, with the objection of the imaginable summation successful AML.

“That semipermanent survey of cultivation workers, with a comparatively well-defined exposure, implicit present approaching 20 years, shows nary grounds of a hazard of cancer,” Alan Boobis, an emeritus prof of toxicology astatine Imperial College London, told us. Boobis led the FAO/WHO committee that evaluated glyphosate successful 2016.

Other researchers person been reluctant to construe the AHS arsenic vindicating glyphosate. “Even though the Agricultural Health Study was mostly negative, determination are different studies that were powerfully positive,” Dr. Philip Landrigan, a pediatrician and nationalist wellness doc astatine Boston College who signed the Seattle Glyphosate Symposium statement, told us.

At the symposium, helium called a 2019 meta-analysis the “most noteworthy” of the newer studies successful humans. (Meta-analyses besides effort to marque consciousness of the information wide by combining results from aggregate studies.) A spokesperson for Mace, the typical from South Carolina, had highlighted this survey erstwhile asked astir the information down her concerns astir glyphosate.

The study recovered that groups reporting the highest level of glyphosate-based herbicide vulnerability had a 41% higher complaint of NHL than those who did not study use.

“I really bash deliberation the technological grounds is truly strong” implicating glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides arsenic carcinogens, Luoping Zhang, the archetypal writer of the survey and an adjunct prof emerita of toxicology astatine the University of California, Berkeley, told us. Zhang was connected a 2016 EPA sheet that reviewed glyphosate and was 1 of the signers of the Seattle Glyphosate Symposium statement. She has been an adept witnesser for plaintiffs successful glyphosate lawsuits.

However, a 2020 EPA review of Zhang’s meta-analysis questioned whether the researchers had a bully rationale for zeroing successful connected the highest-exposure groups. The reappraisal emphasized that the updated AHS survey — which it called “the largest survey and of the highest quality” — recovered nary motion of an expanding hazard of NHL successful radical exposed to higher levels of glyphosate.

Zhang defended her team’s prime to look astatine high-exposure groups arsenic communal sense. “If you are reasoning vulnerability to chemic A tin origin cancer, everybody would judge the much you expose, the higher level you expose,” the higher the accidental of cancer, she told us.

Divergent Readings of Rodent Studies

Scientists often look astatine information successful rodents to amended recognize whether a chemic is apt to beryllium harmful to humans, arsenic it is imaginable to exposure the mice and rats to precise quantities of the substance and measure its effects implicit a comparatively abbreviated play of time. Again, groups diverged successful their valuation of the information connected glyphosate, with IARC finding “sufficient” grounds successful animals that it could origin crab and regulators viewing the rodent crab information much skeptically.

An important origin is that antithetic groups reviewing glyphosate did not trust connected precisely the aforesaid data, Eastmond said. IARC lone considers information that the nationalist has entree to. Regulatory agencies see proprietary information submitted from companies, and the FAO/WHO radical besides gained entree to this data. 

Some scientists have contended that IARC did not decently relationship for the galore statistical comparisons successful the rodent data. With much comparisons, it becomes much apt that determination volition beryllium statistically important results by accidental alone. “That’s portion of the crushed radical tin construe things rather differently,” Eastmond said.

In coming to its decision connected glyphosate’s carcinogenicity, IARC cited an accrued complaint of a uncommon signifier of kidney crab successful a benignant of antheral laboratory rodent exposed to glyphosate and accrued crab of the humor vessels successful exposed antheral mice, arsenic good arsenic increases successful immoderate benign kidney tumors.

Other groups interpreted the rodent information differently. “Based connected the weight-of-evidence evaluations, the bureau has concluded that nary of the tumors evaluated successful idiosyncratic rat and rodent carcinogenicity studies are treatment-related,” for assorted reasons, the EPA concluded successful its review. The bureau did not find a important summation successful kidney tumors successful mice, aft a reanalysis recovered an further tumor successful the power mice that antecedently had not been seen. The EPA’s reappraisal besides noted that immoderate mice successful the survey received atypically precocious doses of glyphosate.

The European Chemicals Agency, oregon ECHA, likewise concluded successful 2022 that the rodent information “did not show convincing grounds of glyphosate induced” tumors. The radical did find immoderate accrued uncommon kidney tumors successful antheral mice exposed to precise precocious levels of glyphosate but called the relevance to humans “low” owed to the precocious dose.

The FAO/WHO radical that Eastmond and Boobis were a portion of, meanwhile, “concluded that glyphosate is not carcinogenic successful rats but could not exclude the anticipation that it is carcinogenic successful mice astatine precise precocious doses,” according to the 2016 report released connected its conclusions. However, the radical — which was lone tasked with assessing the effects of pesticides successful nutrient — concluded that “those effects were seen astatine specified precocious doses that we did not deliberation it was applicable for the decisions we were making astir pesticide residues successful the diet,” Eastmond said.

Some radical with concerns astir glyphosate mention a June 2025 study successful rats arsenic grounds that the herbicide tin beryllium carcinogenic astatine little doses. (The adjutant for Booker, the legislator from New Jersey, cited this study, among different sources suggesting glyphosate is carcinogenic.) The survey recovered elevated rates of assorted cancers successful rats exposed to glyphosate oregon glyphosate-based herbicides opening successful utero and done their lives. This included an summation successful early-life leukemia, which is uncommon successful the benignant of rats studied. The researchers utilized doses of glyphosate pegged to European regulatory limits for regular exposure.

“What that says to maine is that the levels that radical are being exposed to contiguous successful nutrient … those levels person risk,” Landrigan said, adding that the survey establishes that glyphosate causes cancer. “The hazard to immoderate 1 idiosyncratic whitethorn beryllium comparatively low, but erstwhile millions of radical are exposed … determination are ever going to beryllium immoderate radical who devour much contaminated nutrient than others, and determination are ever going to beryllium immoderate radical successful the colonisation who are biologically much delicate than others … truthful crossed a colonisation if you exposure a full colonisation to a chemic that has the powerfulness to origin cancer, past you’re going to propulsion up the hazard crossed the population.”

However, immoderate scientists have criticized the survey arsenic utilizing antithetic statistical and different methods, portion noting that its conclusions opposition with those of different rat studies.

In a July 2025 review, for example, scientists from the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment — the radical that led the astir caller European Union information reappraisal of glyphosate – wrote that “due to its design, the survey is lone precise constricted successful its comparability with the galore semipermanent studies connected glyphosate that are already available” and “does not refute their findings.” The German reappraisal said that anterior studies utilizing acold higher exposures had not gotten akin results.

The “unusual” survey plan of the caller rat survey “doesn’t successful itself invalidate the study, but it means that it needs to beryllium unfastened to scrutiny,” Boobis said. “They person been precise reluctant to fto outsiders entree to the earthy data, the pathology slides, etc., to bash autarkic evaluation.” He besides called the mode the survey counted the tumors and compared the groups of rats “extremely unconventional.”

Sifting Through the Mechanistic Data

The 3rd enactment of grounds scientists usage to measure whether a chemic is carcinogenic is whether determination is simply a mechanistic mentation for however it causes cancer. Again, groups person travel to divergent conclusions astir whether glyphosate leads to cancer-related changes.

IARC recovered “strong” mechanistic grounds that glyphosate causes cancer, citing grounds that it damages DNA, called genotoxicity. The radical besides recovered grounds of oxidative stress, a much indirect measurement of imaginable carcinogenicity. Cells are considered to beryllium nether oxidative accent erstwhile they autumn down connected dealing with reactive oxygen-containing molecules. In the long-term, this tin pb to cancer.

In contrast, the EPA review concluded that the disposable information showed that glyphosate does not origin DNA mutations erstwhile consumed by mouth. The FAO/WHO radical besides did not find genotoxic effects from glyphosate successful mammals exposed orally, and the European ECHA valuation besides concluded glyphosate did not origin mutations.

Eastmond, who helped pb the FAO/WHO group’s efforts to measurement the mechanistic evidence, said that radical whitethorn travel to antithetic conclusions astir genotoxicity successful portion due to the fact that determination are truthful galore studies connected the topic, with wide varying quality, and due to the fact that IARC lone considered published studies portion others had information from the manufacturer. “We focused connected what we thought were the astir applicable for quality hazard by the oral way of exposure,” helium said. “When we did that, we thought the grounds was intelligibly beauteous overwhelmingly antagonistic for genotoxicity.” 

More recently, National Cancer Institute researchers person besides taken urine samples from cultivation workers successful the AHS and found some signs of accrued oxidative accent successful urine that had much glyphosate successful it.

However, Boobis and Eastmond noted that galore substances origin oxidative stress, and that this does not ever pb to cancer.

A antithetic caller NCI study found that among cultivation workers successful the AHS study, higher self-reported vulnerability to glyphosate implicit clip was associated with definite chromosomal changes, though the authors said their results would request to beryllium replicated.

Another question is whether determination is simply a quality betwixt vulnerability to glyphosate connected its ain versus glyphosate-based herbicides, which incorporate different ingredients which are successful immoderate cases proprietary. Some recent mechanistic studies have suggested that glyphosate is improbable to origin cancer-related changes successful cells but rise the anticipation that glyphosate-based herbicides, which besides see different ingredients, whitethorn pb to these changes.

Eastmond acknowledged that contempt the ample magnitude of information connected glyphosate, determination are inactive imaginable gaps. He noted that the archetypal tribunal lawsuit was brought by a idiosyncratic who was exposed “extensively” via the skin, wherever astir studies are of oral exposure. “You could reason possibly there’s a difference,” helium said. He added that helium tells radical to instrumentality precautions portion applying pesticides but doesn’t successful astir cases “worry excessively overmuch astir everything I devour and drink.”

---

Editor’s note: FactCheck.org does not judge advertising. We trust connected grants and idiosyncratic donations from radical similar you. Please see a donation. Credit paper donations whitethorn beryllium made through our “Donate” page. If you similar to springiness by check, nonstop to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, P.O. Box 58100, Philadelphia, PA 19102. 

The station Politicians Say Glyphosate Weedkiller Causes Cancer But Evidence Not Clear-Cut appeared archetypal connected FactCheck.org.