11 hours ago
7
Hot Topic
Whelp, President Donald Trump has been hinting astir perchance moving for a third statesmanlike word successful 2028, adjacent though it goes against the 22nd Amendment. When asked astir what methods helium would usage to tally again during a caller interrogation with Time, Trump said, "There are immoderate loopholes that person been discussed that are good known. But I don't judge successful loopholes. I don't judge successful utilizing loopholes."
1. "No, I’m not for anyone staying successful the bureau for much than 8 years. I’d besides similar word limits connected Congress."
Let's chat astir each things Politics
2. "Stop normalizing this talk. It would beryllium an ILLEGAL 3rd term. Always enactment the connection ILLEGAL successful beforehand of it."
3. "Anyone who supports it, careless of enactment affiliation, cannot simultaneously assertion to enactment the Constitution, including the 'sacred' 2nd Amendment.
4. "No. Unequivocally no. And I americium vocal astir this successful each Trump-friendly nationalist forum. Presidents should service a maximum of 2 presumption and not effort to subvert the Constitution."
5. "No! I voted for him, but word limits request to enactment successful spot — successful fact, each politicians should person word limits."
6. "It’s chaotic that’s 1 of the fewer things the near and close hold on, yet Congress refuses to."
"Because nary 1 connected the close is speaking up astir it. Some of them mightiness admit that it's wrong, but it takes an full curated opus and creation wherever you unit them to speech themselves into a corner, and past they tin yet accidental that they disagree with it, but that is the implicit maximum you volition ever see. It goes nary further due to the fact that they are frightened to spell against him. It's truly sad, honestly."
7. "I would beryllium good with him moving again. If I judge helium is the champion idiosyncratic running, I would ballot for him. If helium is not, past I’ll ballot for idiosyncratic else. I don’t similar the thought of radical staying successful bureau for extended periods, but I’ll ballot for whoever I judge is best."
8. "Any authorities Secretary of State who allows him connected a ballot is violating the Constitution and should beryllium personally prosecuted, careless of the outcome."
9. "I’m ex-MAGA and perfectly not. Even if I were inactive MAGA, perfectly not. It’s unacceptable for him to alteration the word of presidency to beryllium capable to enactment successful office."
10. "I'm a Republican surviving successful a heavy reddish state, and I've ne'er really met anyone who's successful favour of this."
11. "I enactment NO ONE moving for a 3rd term. I privation adjacent much restrictions connected the president. There has got to beryllium an property limit. Anyone with a felony should not beryllium capable to run. There should beryllium a bounds connected run funding. There should besides beryllium word limits connected senators, governors, and judges due to the fact that intelligibly nary of this is working."
12. "It doesn’t matter, he’s not gonna tally a 3rd term, he’s gonna marque definite that he’s declared martial instrumentality to the grade that he’s capable to postpone the elections, indefinitely. He’s gonna marque definite that we’re successful immoderate benignant of civilian enactment that would warrant his declaration of martial law."
13. "Dude, helium is winning a 3rd term, past Vance successful 2032."
14. "Nope. No president successful the past 30 years has deserved adjacent a 2nd term. We person lowered our standards."
15. "I deliberation the question is, would you ballot for Trump, oregon anyone, if they broke the instrumentality and ignored the Constitution, successful bid to tally for a 3rd term, oregon recovered immoderate ineligible and immoral mode to tally a 3rd term? Like, would MAGA enactment the usurpation of the instrumentality to ballot for Trump?"
16. "Why would anyone privation idiosyncratic with the intelligence authorities of his existent caput contiguous to service again different term? The older helium gets, the worse helium gets. Will helium permission quietly? Depends connected whether helium adjacent knows if he’s inactive the president by that time."
17. "My parents are hardcore MAGA, and they said they would not beryllium good with him oregon anyone other doing a 3rd term."
18. "As a conservative, I instrumentality the Constitution seriously, truthful no, a 3rd word is not and should not beryllium imaginable for him. Should helium effort to tally oregon adjacent get connected the ballot somehow, nary mode I’m voting for him. I would besides vehemently reason it connected each fronts. I besides hold with immoderate others connected this thread that we request word limits connected each offices. Eight years for presidents and location reps, 12 years (two terms) for senators, and 15 years max for Supreme Court Justices."
19. "If helium were younger, maybe, but the eventual reply is no. They amended the constitution truthful that the president tin lone service 2 terms. I don't spot him getting enactment for different amendment to overturn the archetypal one. And I don't spot the electoral commissions successful each authorities putting him connected the ballot arsenic agelong arsenic that amendment is intact. I bash similar him arsenic a main executive. The authorities is retired of control, and hopefully, we tin person a amended fund and plans to get this indebtedness down successful 3 years. However, the constitution indispensable beryllium upheld, and that volition mean nary 3rd word for him."
MAGA supporters, would you ballot for Trump if helium ran for a 3rd term? Let america cognize wherefore oregon wherefore not successful the comments oregon successful the anonymous Google signifier below.
Responses person been edited for magnitude and clarity.
English (US) ·