Lululemon's lawsuit against Costco highlights the rise of fashion 'dupes'

2 days ago 7
FILE - An American emblem flies extracurricular a Costco Warehouse successful Cranberry, Pa., connected March 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File) (Gene J. Puskar, Copyright 2025 The Associated Press, All Rights Reserved)

NEW YORK – Fashion “dupes,” oregon little costly versions of high-end covering and different accessories, are conscionable astir everyplace these days. They're besides drafting immoderate businesses into ineligible battles.

In the latest example, Lululemon slapped a suit against Costco connected Friday, accusing the wholesale nine relation of selling lower-priced duplicates of immoderate of its fashionable athleisure apparel.

Across the retail industry, it’s acold from a caller phenomenon. But societal media is pushing the civilization of online dupe buying to caller heights arsenic influencers nonstop their followers to wherever they tin bargain the knockoffs. Want a sensation of Hermès' $1,000 fuzzy slippers? Target has a mentation for $15. Looking for a $2,800 terms Bottega Veneta hobo bag? There’s a mentation for $99 connected online covering and accessories upstart Quince, which has go a go-to for fashionistas.

It's not adjacent the archetypal clip Lululemon has encountered what it says are knockoffs of its clothing, which often transportation steep terms tags of implicit $100 each for leggings and sporty zip-ups. Without specifying further sellers beyond Costco successful Friday’s complaint, Lululemon noted that a fistful companies person “replicated oregon copied” its apparel to merchantability cheaper offerings — including those popularized online done hashtags similar “LululemonDupes” on TikTok and different societal media platforms.

Dupes aren't new

For years, marketers person rolled retired little costly manner and quality alternatives for consumers to bargain alternatively of pricey decorator brands. Unlike much accepted counterfeits, which are amerciable copies of the merchandise that diagnostic an unauthorized trademark oregon logo of a patented brand, “pure” dupes that lucifer definite features of much costly products are mostly legitimate. They tin adjacent spark consciousness of the archetypal items.

But the rising frenzy for dupes signals that galore shoppers privation a sensation of luxury, but nary longer privation to wage for (or attraction about) getting the existent thing.

Late past year, for example, discount concatenation Walmart created a buzz erstwhile it started selling a leather container online that resembled Hermès’ coveted Birkin bag. The $78 point — sold by Kamugo, which doesn’t look to person its ain website — was a fraction of the terms of the original, which goes from $9,000 to hundreds of thousands of dollars connected resale and auction sites. Influencers labeled the leather container a “wirkin.” Other suppliers including BESTSPR, YMTQ and Judy were listed connected Walmart’s tract selling akin totes.

When dupes task into uncertain ineligible territory

Experts accidental immoderate dupes determination into shaky ineligible territory, including copyright and trademark infringement, peculiarly erstwhile a dupe marketer makes mendacious claims astir the duplicate oregon the original.

Look-alikes tin besides frustrate the targeted companies.

Following the viral fame of the “wirkin,” for example, Hermès Executive Chairman Axel Dumas said helium was “irritated” and “annoyed” by the cheaper look-alikes.

“Making a transcript similar this is rather detestable,” Dumas said successful a firm net telephone successful February. Still, helium acknowledged that it was “quite touching” to spot truthful galore consumers privation a container with the Birkin benignant — and that “difference successful quality” was inactive evident, noting that cipher bought the dupe reasoning it was from Hermès.

Meanwhile, Benefit sued E.l.f. for trademark infringement implicit its $6 Lash ’N Roll mascara, which is akin to Benefit’s $29 Roller Lash mascara. But successful December, a California justice recovered that E.l.f.'s mascara didn't deceive shoppers and didn’t infringe the trademarks and commercialized formal of Benefit’s item.

That was the archetypal suit of its benignant successful E.l.f.’s 20-year-history, and the judge’s determination was “a resounding triumph for us,” CEO Tarang Amin antecedently told The Associated Press.

Amin doesn’t similar to telephone his mentation dupes, referring to them arsenic “holy grails" instead. “The basal world is we ever enactment our E.l.f. twist connected it,” helium said. “It’s an E.l.f. merchandise that’s a overmuch amended value.”

Lululemon sues Costco

In its lawsuit, Lululemon argued that Costco had “unlawfully traded” connected Lululemon’s estimation and that it was suing arsenic portion of wider intelligence spot enforcement “directed to retailers who person chosen to transcript alternatively than compete.”

A connection was near Tuesday seeking remark from Costco connected the lawsuit.

The litigation could beryllium much analyzable due to the fact that Lululemon besides alleges that customers cognize Costco uses manufacturers of fashionable branded products for its backstage statement Kirkland brand, though the companies progressive don't uncover that information. Due to this, Lululemon claims astatine slightest immoderate shoppers whitethorn judge that Kirkland-branded products are made by the authentic supplier of the “original” products.

Lululemon accuses Costco of making duplicates of respective producings, including its fashionable Scuba hoodies, Define jackets and ABC pants. Lululemon says 1 of the duplicates that Costco sells is the Hi-Tec Men’s Scuba Full Zip, with the suit showing a screenshot representation of Costco’s website showing the point priced astatine $19.97.

Lululemon recovered itself successful a akin quality with Peloton backmost successful 2021, erstwhile it sued the workout motorcycle institution implicit alleged “copycat products” successful its then-new covering lines. Two years later, the companies announced a five-year partnership that included Lululemon becoming the superior diversion apparel spouse to Peloton.

—-

AP Business Writer Michelle Chapman contributed to this report.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten oregon redistributed without permission.


Read Entire Article