Louisiana Republicans reject bill that would address split jury verdicts, a Jim Crow-era practice

4 hours ago 6
FILE - Gov. Jeff Landry speaks during the commencement of the peculiar league successful the House Chamber connected Monday, Jan. 15, 2024, successful Baton Rouge, La. (Michael Johnson/The Advocate via AP, Pool,File) (Michael Johnson, © 2023 The Advocate)

BATON ROUGE, La. – A Louisiana measure that would person carved retired a way for incarcerated radical convicted by now-banned divided juries the accidental to inquire for a caller proceedings was rejected by Republican authorities senators connected Wednesday, apt sidesplitting the measure.

An estimated 1,000 radical down bars successful the Deep South authorities were convicted by non-unanimous juries, a signifier rooted successful racism from the epoch of “Jim Crow” laws and deemed unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court successful 2020. Advocates accidental it is past clip for Louisiana to close a incorrect and to springiness those radical a accidental astatine a just trial.

Proponents of the measure pointed to aggregate examples of guiltless radical — since exonerated — who were wrongfully convicted by divided juries and spent decades successful prison. Supporters said the measurement could person created a mode for immoderate different perchance guiltless radical down bars who had been convicted by non-unanimous juries to question different accidental for a just trial.

The measure would person added non-unanimous verdicts to a database of claims for which an inmate tin question a retrial. Proponents reiterated that the authorities would lone person created the accidental to bash truthful and that it would not person automatically granted a retrial oregon release.

During statement successful the authorities Senate connected Wednesday, Republican lawmakers raised concerns astir overburdening courts and territory attorneys with further trials. Proponents said whether a caller proceedings is granted is yet astatine the discretion of territory attorneys.

Opponents besides raised concerns astir the cases being decades-old with immoderate witnesses perchance dormant oregon grounds lost. Supporters countered that aged cases are tried each the clip and that transcripts of grounds from the archetypal trials could beryllium used.

“This is astir what’s right, not astir what’s casual oregon convenient,” Sen. Royce Duplessis, the New Orleans Democrat who authored the bill, said to his colleagues.

Louisiana adopted the signifier of divided assemblage convictions successful 1898 during a law normal that was fueled by efforts to support achromatic supremacy aft the Civil War. Diluting the dependable of Black jurors allowed the often-white bulk to find the outcome.

Louisiana voters did not get escaped of the signifier until 2018, 2 years earlier the Supreme Court ruled that it was a usurpation of the 6th Amendment's warrant of the close to an impartial jury.

At the time, Louisiana and Oregon were the lone states that allowed divided decisions — 10-2 oregon 11-1 assemblage votes — to effect successful convictions. The Oregon Supreme Court granted caller trials to hundreds of people. But Louisiana’s Supreme Court rejected arguments to use the ruling retroactively.

“If we take to ballot down this measure we're saying that justness has an expiration date,” Duplessis said. “We person an accidental successful Louisiana to region this stain, due to the fact that close present we are the lone ones wearing it.”

The measure failed connected a ballot of 9-26, on enactment lines. Given the overwhelming deficiency of enactment for the measure successful the Senate and that determination is lone a period near successful this year's Legislative Session, the measurement presently has nary viable way guardant and is apt dead.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten oregon redistributed without permission.


Read Entire Article