11 hours ago
10
pros and cons
Pros
- Lighter frame.
- Adjustable chemoreceptor pieces.
- Thinner framework style.
Cons
- Meant for medicine eyeglass wearers.
- Nosepieces are inactive molded.
- The astir costly glasses Meta offers.
Follow ZDNET: Add america arsenic a preferred source connected Google.
Back successful March, EssilorLuxotica, the genitor institution of Ray-Ban, unveiled a caller mentation of its smart glasses for Meta called the Meta Ray-Ban Blayzer Optics. They're the company's archetypal prescription-focused eyewear, designed to beryllium worn each time agelong by glasses wearers with comfortableness astatine the forefront.
The includes caller replaceable nosepieces arsenic good arsenic immoderate improvements implicit previous-generation hardware, but successful essence it's the same exertion inside arsenic different Gen 2 hardware, specified arsenic the Meta Ray-Ban Wayfarers.
The naming of Meta's Ray-Ban glasses is confusing, but determination are 2 designs of the medicine Optics models: the Blayzer Optics, (which I tested) with a quadrate lens, and the Scriber Optics, with a circular lens.
Also: Ray-Ban Meta vs. Optics: Why glasses wearers should see the caller model
I precocious got my hands connected the second-gen Meta Ray-Ban Blayzer Optics, and I've been wearing them for astir six weeks. Although I person glasses of my own, I'm not a full-time wearer, arsenic I thin to usage them disconnected and on. For my reappraisal unit, I had Essilor usage the medicine successful my speechmaking glasses.
To beryllium clear, these Meta glasses are not the ones announced successful June, adjacent though those glasses are besides made successful collaboration with EssilorLuxotica, without the Ray-Ban branding. The Optics I tested are Ray-Bans done and through, but I bash deliberation Meta could supply clearer branding.
What's caller successful the Meta Ray-Ban Optics?
These glasses diagnostic shorter lenses than erstwhile models, but inactive person a akin chunky frame. Overall, arsenic a bigger feline with precocious cheekbones, I similar this look to different styles, but the framework outlines are inactive a tad chunky for my taste.
Also: I wore Google's Android XR glasses again - and my limit-testing should scare Meta and Apple
The interchangeable nosepieces are not what I was hoping for. The Meta Ray-Ban Optics glasses travel with 3 sets of nosepieces -- the preinstalled 'Universal' set, positive high- and low-bridge sets. The glasses besides travel with a guitar pick-shaped spudger to assistance you region the nosepieces (but I utilized my fingernail).
The Ray-Ban Meta Optics travel with 3 nosepieces.
As mentioned, my precocious cheekbones marque it much hard to acceptable glasses. I'd hoped for a much offset chemoreceptor pad alternatively than thing molded into the frame. I tried each 3 sets, and I could archer determination was a spot of a difference, but the speechmaking glasses I usually deterioration person wired chemoreceptor pads that support the glasses from resting connected my face, and I similar that style.
Also: Meta AI Glasses vs. Meta Ray-Ban: I compared the latest models to determine if it's clip to switch
From a exertion standpoint, the main quality betwixt these and earlier glasses is simply a secondary fastener connected the main seizure button. It looks similar a tiny bluish dot, and the fastener is raised truthful you tin easy find it. The raised fastener adds a third, customizable relation to the glasses. A azygous property captures a photo, a agelong property captures video, and you tin customize the raised fastener to execute a antithetic function, specified arsenic translation, hyperlapse, oregon mute/unmute calls. It's bully to person the 3rd option, for sure.
The secondary enactment fastener connected the Ray-Ban Meta Optics glasses gives you a 3rd option.
The glasses person the aforesaid 12-megapixel camera, susceptible of taking photos and capturing 3K Ultra HD video. Battery beingness is rated astatine astir 8 hours of audio playback. That capableness is importantly reduced erstwhile you commencement capturing photos and video, by the way. The glasses complaint likewise to different Meta Ray-Ban glasses, but via a somewhat thinner case.
Putting Meta AI to the test
To trial the glasses' built-in AI capabilities, I headed to my section room and asked Meta AI to construe immoderate publication covers. I besides asked the AI to adhd events to my calendar. In 1 peculiarly awesome display, I looked astatine a committee with 8 posters and told the glasses to adhd the mediate lawsuit connected the bottom-right poster to my calendar (see below), which the AI successfully did.
A bid of posters shows upcoming events astatine my library. I asked MetaAI to adhd an lawsuit to my calendar, and it did.
That being said, the tech added the lawsuit to my Meta AI calendar, which I don't truly use. When I got a notification via my glasses a period later, I had forgotten astir the event. So, that wasn't overmuch fun.
Overall, these glasses supply a caller enactment for Meta glasses for users with a medicine who privation a functional brace of astute glasses they tin deterioration each day. That's large to have, and with the caller Ray-Ban-less styles that Meta introduced, the glasses travel successful a assortment of terms points arsenic well. These glasses are connected the higher side, however, starting astatine $499.
ZDNET's buying advice
Unfortunately, I don't deliberation the improvements successful the Meta Ray-Ban Optics warrant the precocious terms tag, but I inactive haven't recovered glasses that tin bash everything I want. I volition say, however, that among the Meta Ray-Ban glasses I've tested, these person the champion style.
If you're looking for a brace of astute glasses you tin deterioration each time with your prescription, they acceptable that usage case. But the glasses complaint a premium terms for it. If you're looking astatine alternatives, I'd urge the Meta Ray-Ban Wayfarers, which person overmuch of the aforesaid second-gen hardware and are astir $100 cheaper.
English (US) ·