I Watched "The Devil Wears Prada 2" To See If It's Another Hacky Sequel

1 hour ago 7

Note: This station is an Op-Ed and shares the author's idiosyncratic views.

Look, I primitively didn't adjacent privation to ticker The Devil Wears Prada 2.

A pistillate   with abbreviated  hairsbreadth  and glasses wears a colorful, tasseled jacket, looking intently ahead

20th Century Studios

I person a profoundly parasocial narration with the archetypal movie. Like Andy, I moved to New York to go a journalist, and I besides recovered myself (very briefly) subbing successful arsenic the adjunct to an editor-in-chief of a women's magazine. One day, I was sitting astatine my table erstwhile I recovered retired that a person of excavation had been diagnosed with cancer. I lone fto myself teardrop up erstwhile I was retired of the bureau building, delivering a garment bag, with lines from Stanley Tucci's Nigel circling successful my head. It mightiness not beryllium a cleanable movie, but it's 1 of my favorites.

Two characters converse outdoors by a chromatic  bridge, 1  successful  a sweater and tie, and the different   holding a telephone  successful  a blouse

20th Century Studios

But, beyond the particulars of my life, I judge that the crushed the archetypal movie has had specified staying powerfulness implicit the years is that it is fundamentally astir the sacrifices women indispensable marque to beryllium large successful a strategy that is cruel, capitalistic, and patriarchal.

A pistillate   with abbreviated  hair, wearing a airy  sweater, is seated and holding glasses, saying 2  quotes astir  media perceptions of her demanding character

20th Century Studios

On the different hand, The Devil Wears Prada 2 is simply a atrocious movie astir a manner magazine.

Three radical   successful  a stylish bureau   setting, each   dressed successful  ceremonial  attire; the cardinal  fig  wears a acheronian  suit

20th Century Studios

To commencement with, the dialog is shallow, obvious, and repetitive, similar a made-for-streaming task that perpetually repeats its crippled backmost to its phone-addicted viewer. Beat for beat, the archetypal movie is retread with nary of the hostility oregon bite. There felt thing caustic astir the archetypal film; manner houses notably refused to enactment with it due to the fact that they were truthful afraid of Anna Wintour. Now, clad successful Dior and paired with Diet Coke merchandise placement, the 2nd movie is present to archer you that the aged ways are great, actually.

A quality  successful  nonrecreational  attire stands successful  an bureau   mounting  with a superior   expression, gesturing halt  with some  hands

20th Century Studios

To beryllium clear, it feels similar determination are nary existent stakes successful this movie. This is astir an unthinkable feat, fixed the abundance of root worldly successful the existent publishing satellite successful 2026. The opening is excessively rushed to marque immoderate of Andy’s motivations consciousness hopeless oregon particularly plausible. She laments however execs are paid successful millions portion writers are laid off, a remark that goes nowhere. Every quality has excessively overmuch money, which wouldn't inherently beryllium unspeakable (see: Succession) if they weren't a surface-level mentation of their erstwhile selves. Like, oh, gasp, Miranda has to alert economy. Won't idiosyncratic deliberation of the children!

Two characters from a TV amusement   are having a speech  successful  an bureau   setting, 1  wearing a blazer, the different   successful  a quilted jacket

20th Century Studios

There's a girl-boss mentation of what happened astatine the Washington Post that's expected to be...a bully thing?

Let's speech astir Miranda. Remember however she lone ever — allegedly — smiled once? This Miranda has nary of the panic and doubly the emotion, which could lone person worked if it felt adjacent vaguely earned, which it does not. This movie has managed to instrumentality 1 of the great, analyzable villains of cinema and has alternatively framed her to look short. She's present a decennary precocious for the HR-approved connection successful the bureau conversation, a recurring spot that lacks immoderate wound and already feels hopelessly dated.

Person wearing a sequin overgarment   and patterned scarf, walking done  a dimly lit, elegant indoor mounting  with vintage decor

20th Century Studios

As for the caller characters, Simone Ashley is wasted arsenic a redux of Emily's character. The romanticist subplot manages to beryllium infinitely much pointless than the 1 successful the archetypal movie. There's an endless barrage of cameos, which service nary intent beyond making america go, "Oh, that guy." Why should I attraction that Jon Batiste is successful a country arsenic himself? Not a azygous 1 manages to propulsion fractional arsenic overmuch value arsenic the Harry Potter subplot successful the archetypal movie, and J.K. Rowling wasn't adjacent connected surface for that.

Two women successful  an bureau   setting; 1  wears a blazer and pants, the different   a blouse and skirt, holding documents and a phone

20th Century Studios

And convey deity she wasn't!

If you privation a movie with large apparel and changeless throwbacks to the original, you volition beryllium pleased. But if you dared anticipation for a movie that mightiness accidental thing slightly insightful, you volition privation you had walked retired halfway through.

Two radical   are successful  a closet, holding up   clothes. One is wearing a patterned vest, shirt, and tie, looking astatine  the other, who's wearing a collared dress

20th Century Studios

What did you marque of the movie? LMK successful the comments.

A reappraisal  of "The Devil Wears Prada 2" (2026) describes it arsenic  a "ghoulish, soulless husk of the original." Watched connected  April 30, 2026

Read Entire Article