How Rhode Island finally pushed a partial assault weapons ban over the finish line

PROVIDENCE, R.I. – Passing a caller instrumentality restricting battle weapons took Rhode Island lawmakers much than 10 years, but it whitethorn connection a roadworthy representation to different states looking to easiness the proliferation of specified firearms.

For advocates, the combat is simply a premier illustration of the existent challenges to passing weapon power measures successful the U.S., peculiarly surrounding semiautomatic rifles that person go the limb of prime among those liable for astir of the country’s devastating wide shootings.

When Rhode Island's measure was signed into instrumentality by Democratic Gov. Dan McKee precocious past month, its sponsor, Democratic Rep. Jason Knight, told jubilant supporters: “What was erstwhile the intolerable became the inevitable.”

How? Persistent advocacy, a alteration successful legislative enactment and a last-minute overhaul to enactment the broader ineligible landscape.

What did Rhode Island do?

Rhode Island's ban, which goes into effect successful 2026, prohibits the sale, manufacturing and organisation of definite high-powered firearms that were erstwhile banned nationwide. The instrumentality does not prohibit possessing specified weapons, a cardinal favoritism compared with different battle limb bans enacted elsewhere successful the U.S.

Currently, lone Washington authorities has a similar law.

A enactment alteration helped propel momentum

The battle weapons prohibition got a much-needed boost from Senate President Valerie Lawson, who secured the Senate's apical spot successful the mediate of league aft her predecessor, Sen. Dominick Ruggiero, died successful April. Lawson turned to the bill's sponsors and others to find communal crushed betwixt lawmakers successful the House and Senate who remained divided connected however acold the instrumentality should go.

Lawson's endorsement was seen arsenic captious to securing the bill's passage, whereas Ruggiero had antecedently deferred action, pointing alternatively to the request for Congress to enactment alternatively than a authorities Legislature taking the lead.

“There are issues astatine definite points that conscionable the moment,” Lawson said. “I deliberation it was the clip for this."

Gun power advocates besides acknowledged that banning battle weapons successful Rhode Island hadn't antecedently been a apical precedence fixed that the authorities has mostly been spared from national high-profile shootings that sometimes assistance propel legislative change.

Assault weapons bans consistently look tribunal challenges

In the U.S., conscionable 11 states and Washington D.C. person immoderate benignant of prohibition connected definite high-powered firearms that were once banned nationwide. Rhode Island's mentation is the lone 1 not yet facing a law situation — though a suit against it is each but assured.

Certain authorities ineligible battles are connected clasp until others marque their mode done little national courts. To date, nary of the lawsuits person been wholly thrown out, but the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to person the last say.

As Rhode Island lawmakers were successful the mediate of their weapon debate, the precocious tribunal declined to perceive a situation to Maryland's battle weapons prohibition — a determination that immoderate of the more blimpish justices opposed. Justice Brett Kavanaugh adjacent signaled that laws banning battle weapons are apt unconstitutional.

“Opinions from different Courts of Appeals should assistance this Court’s eventual determination making connected the AR–15 issue,” Kavanaugh wrote, referencing a fashionable benignant of high-powered rifle.

Yet the ineligible absorption connected banning specified weapons often hinges connected possessing firearms specified arsenic AR-15-style rifles and AK-47s, alternatively than connected the organisation process. Rhode Island lawmakers anticipation that by tailoring their battle weapons prohibition to sales, manufacturing and distribution, they mightiness volition bypass the thorniest ineligible questions raised by the Second Amendment.

What different states are doing

Attempts to grow Democratic-dominated Hawaii’s battle weapons prohibition to rifles successful summation to pistols stalled this year. In New Mexico, Democratic lawmakers who power the General Assembly adjourned without taking up an battle limb ban.

In Rhode Island, advocates accidental their enactment isn't over.

“It’s progress,” said Melissa Carden, enforcement manager of the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence. “But we cognize that a existent battle weapons prohibition includes an enforceable prohibition connected possession arsenic well."

Defenders of Rhode Island’s instrumentality bristle that their mentation could beryllium considered weak. They constituent retired that residents looking to acquisition an battle limb from adjacent New Hampshire oregon elsewhere volition beryllium blocked. That’s due to the fact that national instrumentality prohibits radical from traveling to a antithetic authorities to acquisition a weapon and returning it to a authorities wherever that peculiar of limb is banned.

“Some of my constituents person already called maine and made comments astir ‘bad, atrocious bad, I’m going retired and buying 3 and 4 of them now,’” said Sen. Louis DiPalma, the Senate sponsor of the statute. “Okay, travel July 1st adjacent year, you volition not beryllium capable to bash that anymore.”

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten oregon redistributed without permission.