Federal judge will hear arguments as groups try to block Trump's executive order on elections

NEW YORK – A national justice connected Thursday volition perceive arguments successful 3 cases from national Democrats and voting rights groups that are challenging President Donald Trump’s caller enforcement bid connected elections, which, among different changes, would necessitate impervious of citizenship to registry to ballot successful national elections.

The Democratic National Committee, the League of United Latin American Citizens, the League of Women Voters Education Fund and others are seeking to artifact Trump's sweeping overhaul of national predetermination processes, alleging that the changes helium wants are unconstitutional.

The Republican president’s executive order says the U.S. has failed “to enforce basal and indispensable predetermination protections” and calls connected states to enactment with national agencies to stock elector lists and prosecute predetermination crimes. It threatens to propulsion national backing from states wherever predetermination officials don’t comply.

It besides aims to mandate large changes to predetermination processes, including adding a proof-of-citizenship request to the national elector registration signifier and requiring each message ballots to beryllium received, alternatively than conscionable postmarked, by Election Day nationwide.

The plaintiffs reason Trump’s bid is amerciable due to the fact that it asserts powerfulness that helium does not person implicit an autarkic agency. That agency, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, sets voluntary voting strategy guidelines and maintains the national elector registration form.

The plaintiffs besides reason the bid violates the Constitution, which says that states — not the president — get to determine the “times, places and manner” of however elections are run. The Constitution's alleged Elections Clause besides gives Congress the powerfulness to “make oregon alter” predetermination regulations, astatine slightest for national office, but it doesn’t notation immoderate statesmanlike authorization implicit predetermination administration.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly successful Washington, D.C., volition see the plaintiffs' pleas for a preliminary injunction, temporarily blocking the bid arsenic the lawsuits play out. She instructed the parties to beryllium prepared to sermon a scope of topics, including whether the Election Assistance Commission tin comply with Trump’s demands portion pursuing the instrumentality and whether the plaintiffs person lasting to rise each of their claims.

Justin Levitt, a erstwhile Justice Department lawyer and a White House advisor during President Joe Biden’s administration, said the Constitution is wide that the president has precise small authorization to modulate national elections. But helium said helium expects the proceeding volition see statement implicit whether these groups person lasting to writer and whether it is the due clip to bring a lawsuit.

“This is simply a beauteous casual lawsuit erstwhile it comes to the ineligible merits, but whether they get to the ineligible merits is not trivial,” helium said.

The proceeding comes arsenic different lawsuits against Trump’s enforcement bid are pending.

Earlier this month, 19 Democratic attorneys wide asked the court to cull Trump’s enforcement order. The pursuing day, Washington and Oregon, 2 states that clasp all-mail elections, followed up with their ain suit against the order.

___

Associated Press writer Christina A. Cassidy successful Atlanta contributed to this report.

___

The Associated Press receives enactment from respective backstage foundations to heighten its explanatory sum of elections and democracy. See much astir the AP’s ideology inaugural here. The AP is solely liable for each content.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten oregon redistributed without permission.