‘Blindly trust their word’: Judge scoffs at Trump admin demand to just believe them in deportation case of Venezuelan man with ‘perfect compliance’ under ICE supervision

4 hours ago 2

Donald Trump looks up   portion    successful  the Oval Office.

President Donald Trump listens during a swearing successful ceremonial for Dr. Mehmet Oz to beryllium Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, successful the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, April 18, 2025, successful Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

A national justice successful California has granted a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump medication from deporting a Venezuelan antheral to a notorious enactment situation successful El Salvador without giving him astatine slightest 2 weeks’ announcement of “any” removal attempt, according to her order.

U.S. District Judge Sunshine S. Sykes, a Joe Biden appointee, approved a petition Wednesday to person a impermanent restraining bid (TRO) she issued connected April 25 into a preliminary injunction for Yostin Sleiker Gutierrez-Contreras, who came to the U.S. successful May 2024 and was enrolled successful the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) biometric reporting database.

Sykes wrote that, arsenic she antecedently found, Gutierrez-Contreras raises “a superior question” astir whether his removal nether the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act (AEA) — a rarely-used wartime instrumentality — would interruption his owed process rights without a 14-day notice. The TRO she issued successful April had required specified notice, and Wednesday’s ruling present bars the authorities from deporting him without two-weeks’ announcement until a last judgement is issued. Because the lawsuit is not a class-action lawsuit, the ruling lone applies to Gutierrez-Contreras.

“Maintaining the presumption quo is inactive required to forestall the contiguous and irreparable wounded that whitethorn occur,” Sykes said.

Love existent crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life transgression stories delivered close to your inbox.

In September 2024, Gutierrez-Contreras reported to ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations successful San Bernardino, California, wherever authorities determined that helium “had a imaginable affiliation” with the Venezuelan pack Tren de Aragua (TdA) based connected tattoos helium had.

Gutierrez-Contreras “vigorously dispute[ed] immoderate TdA affiliation” and was allowed to stay successful the state nether supervision. He allegedly maintained “perfect compliance” with his supervision, but that didn’t halt national agents from taking Gutierrez-Contreras into custody connected March 19. A justice ordered him released with pretrial conditions connected March 26, but ICE officials instantly took him backmost into custody.

On April 12, Gutierrez-Contreras’ counsel learned that the authorities was readying connected removing him to El Salvador nether the AEA. He was transferred from California to a installation successful Texas 2 days later.

On Wednesday, Sykes cited U.S. Supreme Court precedent requiring that individuals detained nether the Alien Enemies Act “must person announcement … that they are taxable to removal nether the Act[,]” and that the announcement indispensable beryllium provided “within a tenable clip and successful specified a mode arsenic volition let them to really question habeas alleviation successful the due venue earlier specified removal occurs.”

The authorities had antecedently failed to supply the tribunal with what it considered to beryllium announcement “within a tenable time” nether the Supreme Court’s requirement, according to Sykes.

The Trump medication yet managed to record a announcement for Gutierrez-Contreras and what they believed a tenable clip would beryllium — a “limited window” of 12 hours — but the paperwork was “inadequate,” according to Sykes, for aggregate reasons.

“First, respondents’ announcement signifier is lone written successful English, says thing astir a person’s close to question reappraisal of their AEA determination, and says thing astir their constricted model of 12 hours to explicit intent to record a habeas petition earlier they are placed connected a level for removal,” Sykes said. “Further, this signifier does thing to supply announcement arsenic to the reasons for their AEA designation for removal and the tribunal has nary warrant that respondents volition work it to detainees successful a connection they recognize different than respondents’ connection that they will,” the justice added.

Sykes stated that the authorities has failed to supply “any information” to substantiate concerns the DOJ has raised astir compromising operational information and different reasons for not having to springiness 14-day notice.

“Instead, respondents seemingly expect the tribunal to trust connected their contention without providing circumstantial examples and fundamentally blindly spot their word, conscionable arsenic they did erstwhile they insisted the authorities had developed capable procedures for providing individuals nether the AEA with tenable announcement of their removal successful their absorption to the TRO,” she wrote.

Sykes pointed to the lawsuit of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a protected begetter from Maryland who attorneys accidental was wrongly deported to El Salvador nether the Trump medication with nary effort made to facilitate his return.

“If the United States erroneously removed an idiosyncratic to different state based connected the Proclamation, a important likelihood exists that the idiosyncratic could not beryllium returned to the United States,” Sykes said, citing the case.

The authorities argues that Gutierrez-Contreras’ assertion of wounded is “purely speculative,” asserting that helium hasn’t been designated an “alien enemy” and that the Department of Homeland Security has established capable announcement procedures to situation immoderate aboriginal removal nether the AEA. It antecedently claimed that granting alleviation would irreparably harm overseas policy, but the DOJ failed to explicate however “other than quoting assorted cases informing astir the ‘dangers of judicial interference successful the behaviour of overseas policy,'” according to Sykes.

“Again, the tribunal volition not trust solely connected Respondents’ connection erstwhile an individual’s owed process rights are concerned,” the justice concluded.

Jerry Lambe contributed to this report. 

Read Entire Article