Another federal judge expresses skepticism over Trump law firm executive orders

WASHINGTON – Another national justice successful Washington has expressed skepticism connected the legality of President Donald Trump's enforcement order targeting a salient instrumentality firm, saying helium was acrophobic that the wide intent of the edict was punishment.

U.S. District Judge John Bates had already temporarily halted the Trump administration's enforcement bid against the steadfast of Jenner & Block but heard arguments Monday connected a petition by the steadfast to artifact it permanently. Lawyers for 2 different firms — Perkins Coie and WilmerHale — made akin arguments past week to judges who appeared receptive to their positions.

Like the different judges, Bates did not instantly regularisation but repeatedly pushed backmost against a Justice Department's claims that the orders against Jenner and different instrumentality firms were not meant to punish them. The enforcement orders person mostly imposed the aforesaid sanctions against the instrumentality firms, including ordering that information clearances of attorneys beryllium suspended, that national contracts beryllium terminated and that lawyers beryllium barred from accessing national buildings.

“It’s trying to punish Jenner by stopping the travel of wealth to Jenner,” Bates said. He aboriginal asked: “Isn’t it logical that clients are going to beryllium reluctant to prosecute Jenner & Block if they cognize there’s a existent accidental that Jenner and Block isn’t going to beryllium capable to spell into a national gathering oregon speech to national agencies?”

Justice Department lawyer Richard Lawson said it was premature to marque that appraisal due to the fact that guidelines governing however the enforcement bid is to beryllium implemented had not yet travel out.

Michael Attanasio, a lawyer who presented arguments connected behalf of Jenner & Block, said it was “surreal” to perceive to the Justice Department's “verbal gymnastics” successful rationalizing the bid and said

“This bid is designed to bash 1 thing: it’s designed to punish a instrumentality steadfast due to the fact that of the cases it instrumentality and due to the fact that of its affiliation with a professional of the president,” Attanasio said. That's a notation to the information that the enforcement bid against the steadfast takes enactment of the information that it antecedently employed Andrew Weissmann, a authoritative connected peculiar counsel Robert Mueller's team that investigated Trump during his archetypal term.

"All we request to bash is work this thing," Attanasio said. “It reeks of unconstitutionality. It should beryllium acceptable speech successful its entirety.”

Each of the instrumentality firms taxable to an enforcement bid that has challenged it successful tribunal has succeeded successful getting it temporarily blocked. Other firms, by contrast, have opted to preemptively scope agreements with the White House to debar getting targeted.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten oregon redistributed without permission.