2 hours ago
4
Follow ZDNET: Add america arsenic a preferred source on Google.
ZDNET's cardinal takeaways
- FreeBSD is 1 of the astir unchangeable OSes connected the planet.
- FreeBSD is besides much challenging than Linux.
- You tin download and instal FreeBSD for free.
I'm not gonna lie: I don't springiness FreeBSD (or immoderate of the BSDs) the attraction they deserve. The crushed for that is simple: I'm a Linux guy.
But isn't FreeBSD Linux? It looks similar Linux, it smells similar Linux…
That is not the lawsuit here.
FreeBSD is simply a Unix-like operating strategy that is descended from the Berkeley Software Distribution. The archetypal mentation of FreeBSD was released successful 1993 and was developed from 386BSD, 1 of the archetypal afloat functional and escaped Unix clones connected affordable hardware. Since its inception, FreeBSD has been the astir wide utilized BSD-derived operating system.
FreeBSD maintains a implicit system: kernel, instrumentality drivers, userland utilities, and documentation. This is successful opposition to Linux, which lone provides a kernel and drivers portion relying connected 3rd parties for strategy software.
Also: The champion Linux laptops close now
Think of FreeBSD arsenic a much challenging mentation of Linux. This operating strategy doesn't clasp your hand, truthful you mightiness larn a happening oregon 2 arsenic you instal it and the bundle you require.
Even for a seasoned Linux seasoned similar me, FreeBSD tin often beryllium a head-scratcher.
There's an aged adage that goes thing similar this:
BSD is what you get erstwhile a clump of Unix hackers beryllium down to effort to larboard a Unix strategy to the PC. Linux is what you get erstwhile a clump of PC hackers beryllium down and effort to constitute a Unix strategy for the PC.
Also: The champion Linux distros for beginners marque switching from MacOS oregon Windows truthful easy
Essentially, FreeBSD is Unix, wherever Linux is based connected Unix. To that end, FreeBSD (and astir of the BSDs) marque for astonishing server operating systems. If you were to inquire immoderate long-in-the-tooth geeks astir server operating systems, they'd apt accidental that BSD is what you want. There truly isn't a much unchangeable operating strategy connected the planet.
And that's 1 of the large draws to FreeBSD: it is arsenic rock-solid arsenic they come.
Sure, I speech a batch astir however reliable Debian is, but adjacent Debian can't interaction the stableness of FreeBSD.
Remember erstwhile I said earlier that FreeBSD maintains a implicit system, whereas Linux is truly conscionable the kernel and drivers (although I often balk astatine that claim)?
To framework it better...
Imagine 2 companies that marque cars. One outsources each of its components from different manufacturers and assembles them successful its warehouse. The 2nd builds each of its components and besides assembles them successful its warehouse.
As you mightiness assume, the 2nd manufacturer's cars astir apt enactment and execute amended than the archetypal due to the fact that it knows each portion that goes into creating the car and tin marque each sorts of adjustments to amended each facet of it. The archetypal manufacturer, connected the different hand, doesn't person astir the power implicit however those components are built.
FreeBSD is the shaper that builds everything in-house.
Once you get FreeBSD up and running, you tin perfectly trust connected it.
Getting it up and moving is the issue.
Before I dive into this, I've covered a antithetic spirit of BSD, GhostBSD, which was really overmuch easier than FreeBSD. GhostBSD is to BSD what Ubuntu is to Linux, whereas FreeBSD is to BSD what Arch is to Linux.
Installing FreeBSD
Although the FreeBSD installer is strictly command-line, it's not hard. In fact, erstwhile you commencement the installer, you tin judge astir each of the defaults simply by hitting Enter connected your keyboard. Yes, you'll person to type/verify a basal password and past make a modular user, but that's beauteous overmuch the gist of the installation.
However, erstwhile the installation is complete, each you upwind up with is an operating strategy without a GUI. It's each commands astatine this point.
Naturally, I decided to excavation successful and instal the KDE Plasma desktop environment connected my FreeBSD installation, and it was not astir arsenic casual arsenic it is connected Linux. Here are the steps I had to instrumentality to adhd KDE Plasma to FreeBSD.
- Install each of the indispensable packages with pkg instal kde plasma6-sddm-kcm sddm xorg.
- Enable/start dbus with service dbus alteration && work dbus start.
- Enable/start the login manager with service sddm alteration && work sddm start.
Once that was taken attraction of, I had a usable KDE Plasma desktop.
Also: Garuda KDE Dr460nized mightiness beryllium the coolest-looking Linux distro available
However, upon glancing astatine the commencement menu, determination were precise fewer apps installed. So, I fired up KDE Discover, lone to find retired it wouldn't work. The crushed for this is PackageKit, an open-source bundle suite that simplifies the installation and absorption of bundle packages connected Linux systems. Simplify, being the operative word.
Unfortunately, PackageKit continually crashed, truthful KDE Discover was useless, and each app installations had to beryllium done via the bid line. Given I'm precise comfy with the bid line, that's perfectly fine.
On a whim, I installed GNOME, but the GDM login manager wouldn't start, truthful I stuck with KDE Plasma.
A full batch of learning going on
In the end, I learned rather a spot aft my acquisition with FreeBSD. First and foremost, FreeBSD is decidedly not Linux, but my Linux skills surely came successful handy. As well, FreeBSD takes immoderate other effort to get up and moving arsenic a desktop OS, but the stableness you summation for that clip spent is good worthy it.
FreeBSD is besides truly fast. I've seen Linux execute incredibly well, but FreeBSD benignant of puts it to shame.
With each of that said, americium I consenting to marque the leap from Linux to FreeBSD? Probably not. The biggest crushed for that is the simplicity of Linux. Everything I bash successful FreeBSD takes considerably much clip than it does connected Linux. Given however engaged I americium these days, I don't person the other clip to walk getting a desktop functional, particularly erstwhile connected Linux it "just works."
However, whenever stableness is perfectly key, you tin stake FreeBSD volition beryllium my archetypal choice.
English (US) ·