‘A solemn mockery of the Constitution itself’: Judge moves to hold Trump admin in criminal contempt over deportation flights ordered to turn around

A national justice successful Washington, D.C., is moving to clasp the Trump medication successful transgression contempt for ignoring his March bid to crook astir aggregate flights carrying Venezuelan migrants that were being deported without owed process done the president’s unprecedented usage of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 (AEA).

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg connected Wednesday said helium had determined that the national authorities demonstrated a “willful disregard” for his order, which was “sufficient for the Court to reason that probable origin exists to find the Government successful transgression contempt.”

“The Court does not scope specified decision lightly oregon hastily; indeed, it has fixed Defendants ample accidental to rectify oregon explicate their actions. None of their responses has been satisfactory,” Boasberg wrote successful a 46-page order. “The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders — particularly by officials of a coordinate subdivision who person sworn an oath to uphold it. To licence specified officials to freely ‘annul the judgments of the courts of the United States’ would not conscionable ‘destroy the rights acquired nether those judgments’; it would marque ‘a solemn mockery’ of ‘the constitution itself.’ ‘So fatal a effect indispensable beryllium deprecated by all.'”

Boasberg connected March 15, held an exigency proceeding wherever helium granted a impermanent restraining order (TRO) barring the medication from deporting individuals nether the AEA successful a suit brought by 5 Venezuelan migrants accused of being members of the Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang. During the proceedings, the justice besides issued an oral seat ruling ordering the authorities to crook astir immoderate planes containing Venezuelan migrants that were already successful the aerial and instrumentality them to the U.S. — an bid that was infamously ignored.

In his ruling, Boasberg said that astatine the clip helium issued his oral order, the Trump medication had already loaded much than 100 migrants onto planes truthful they could beryllium “spirited retired of the United States by the Government earlier they could vindicate their due-process rights by contesting their removability successful a national court, arsenic the instrumentality requires.”

The authorities claimed that due to the fact that the flights had already near U.S. airspace astatine the clip of Boasberg’s order, they were extracurricular of the court’s jurisdiction.

Administration officials besides asserted that they did not person to travel Boasberg’s oral order to crook the planes astir due to the fact that helium did not memorialize the directive successful his consequent written order.

Boasberg addressed the government’s responses to inquiries astir ignoring the tribunal successful his Wednesday order.

“Defendants supply nary convincing crushed to debar the decision that appears evident from the supra factual recitation: that they deliberately flouted this Court’s written Order and, separately, its oral bid that explicitly delineated what compliance entailed,” Boasberg wrote. “They bash not quality that it was hours aft the written Order issued erstwhile they disembarked the people members aboard the 2 planes and transferred them retired of U.S. custody. Rather than connection a mea culpa and effort to explicate this sedate mistake and item plans to rectify it, Defendants connection assorted imaginative arguments for wherefore they nevertheless technically complied with the Order. None of their positions withstands scrutiny.”

Hearings and respective “intemperate and disrespectful” tribunal filings successful the high-profile lawsuit followed, increasing increasingly contentious arsenic the litigation unfolded. However, earlier this period the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the lawsuit — which was brought successful Washington, D.C., arsenic a class-action suit nether the Administrative Procedures Act — had to person been filed arsenic a habeas corpus lawsuit successful Texas, the territory wherever the plaintiffs were being physically detained. Habeas petitions impact detainees challenging the legality of their custody and typically seeking to beryllium released.

Despite the justices vacating Boasberg’s TROs implicit the “legal defect,” the justice said that the precocious court’s ruling “does not excuse the government’s violation.”

“Instead, it is simply a foundational ineligible precept that each judicial bid ‘must beryllium obeyed’ — nary substance however “erroneous” it “may be” — until a court reverses it,” Boasberg wrote. “If a enactment chooses to disobey the bid — alternatively than hold for it to beryllium reversed done the judicial process — specified disobedience is punishable arsenic contempt, notwithstanding immoderate later-revealed deficiencies successful the order. That foundational “rule of law” answers not conscionable however this compliance enquiry tin proceed, but wherefore it must.”

In his ruling, Boasberg said the authorities tin “purge its contempt” by “asserting custody of
the individuals who were removed successful usurpation of the Court’s classwide TRO truthful that they mightiness avail themselves of their close to situation their removability done a habeas proceeding.” The authorities would not beryllium required to merchandise the detainees oregon “transport them backmost to the homeland” to remedy the alleged violation.

“If Defendants opt to purge their contempt, they shall record by April 23, 2025, a declaration explaining the steps they person taken and volition instrumentality to bash so,” helium wrote. “If Defendants opt not to purge their contempt, they shall alternatively record by April 23, 2025, declaration(s) identifying the individual(s) who, with cognition of the Court’s classwide Temporary Restraining Order, made the determination not to halt the transportation of people members retired of U.S. custody connected March 15 and 16, 2025.”

Love existent crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life transgression stories delivered close to your inbox.