A pregnant Cuban emigre worries about her baby's citizenship as Supreme Court weighs a Trump order

WASHINGTON – Barbara, a Cuban emigre 30 weeks into a high-risk pregnancy, is dealing with the further accent of not knowing for definite that her babe miss volition beryllium an American citizen.

“It scares maine a batch that my babe volition beryllium calved without citizenship due to the fact that she would not beryllium a national of this country. Claiming Cuban citizenship is not an enactment due to the fact that we are fleeing from that country,” she said. “I truly don’t cognize what benignant of aboriginal my babe would face. I americium terrified that my babe volition beryllium calved without citizenship. It would beryllium similar she would beryllium stateless. It’s terrible.”

The 35-year-old pistillate lives successful Kentucky, which is not among the 22 states that sued to situation President Donald Trump's executive order that would contradict citizenship to children who are calved connected U.S. ungraded to parents who are successful the state illegally oregon temporarily.

Lower courts person truthful acold blocked the enforcement bid from taking effect anyplace successful the United States. In arguments Thursday, the Supreme Court weighs the Trump administration's petition to constrictive those tribunal orders truthful that they screen lone the parties that sued successful national court. Affected children calved successful Kentucky would not beryllium citizens, if the tribunal sides with the administration.

The pistillate agreed to an interrogation with The Associated Press connected information that her past sanction not beryllium utilized and her look not beryllium shown connected camera.

Barbara has joined the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, 1 of the groups that sued implicit birthright citizenship. Members of the radical apt would beryllium protected nether tribunal orders.

She was a lawyer successful Cuba earlier fleeing spiritual persecution successful 2022 with her husband, a daughter, present 4, and her parents, Barbara said. They are seeking governmental asylum successful the United States.

“I would not privation my girl to turn up successful a nine that excludes her. As a citizen, she volition person a batch of rights. I don’t cognize precisely however galore places she would not beryllium capable to entree if she were not a citizen,” Barbara said.

A imaginable result of the tribunal lawsuit is babies calved to migrant mothers astatine the aforesaid clip successful the aforesaid American infirmary would person antithetic status. One mightiness beryllium a U.S. citizen; the different mightiness not.

Birthright citizenship is among respective issues the medication has asked the tribunal to woody with connected an exigency basis, aft little courts acted to dilatory Trump’s agenda. Several of those subordinate to immigration. The justices are considering the administration’s pleas to end humanitarian parole for much than 500,000 radical from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela and strip other impermanent ineligible protections from different 350,000 Venezuelans.

The medication besides remains locked successful ineligible battles implicit its efforts to swiftly deport radical accused of being pack members to a situation successful El Salvador nether an 18th period wartime instrumentality called the Alien Enemies Act.

If the tribunal agrees to bounds the quality of judges to contented nationwide, oregon universal, injunctions, the restrictions would beryllium allowed to instrumentality effect for present successful astatine slightest 27 states.

The existent combat is implicit what rules volition use portion the lawsuits proceed done the courts. But adjacent though the precocious tribunal is not expected to contented a last determination astir birthright citizenship, a ruling for the medication could pb to a confusing, if temporary, patchwork of rules that mightiness disagree based connected what authorities children are calved successful oregon whether they are members of immigrants rights groups that sued.

Birthright citizenship automatically makes anyone calved successful the United States an American citizen, including children calved to mothers successful the state illegally, nether long-standing rules. The close was enshrined soon aft the Civil War successful the archetypal condemnation of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment.

“All persons calved oregon naturalized successful the United States, and taxable to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside,” the Citizenship Clause reads.

Since astatine slightest 1898 and the Supreme Court lawsuit of Wong Kim Ark, the proviso has been wide interpreted to marque citizens of everyone calved connected U.S. ungraded but for the children of diplomats, who person allegiance to different government; enemies contiguous successful the U.S. during hostile occupation; and, until a national instrumentality changed things successful 1924, sovereign Native American tribes.

Trump and his supporters person argued that determination should beryllium tougher standards for becoming an American citizen, which helium called “a priceless and profound gift” successful the enforcement order. Trump’s bid would contradict citizenship to children if neither genitor is simply a national oregon lawful imperishable resident. Those categories see radical who are successful the state illegally oregon temporarily because, the medication contends, they are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States.

In the Supreme Court case, the medication spends small clip defending Trump's enforcement order, focusing alternatively connected what it calls “an epidemic” of nationwide, oregon universal, injunctions.

“The request for this Court’s involution has go urgent arsenic cosmopolitan injunctions person reached tsunami levels,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote successful a tribunal filing. Judges person issued 39 specified orders against the medication truthful far, the Justice Department said.

At slightest 2 justices, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, person said they judge idiosyncratic judges deficiency the powerfulness to contented nationwide injunctions. Several others person suggested the injunctions rise questions the tribunal mightiness someday answer.

But New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin, starring 1 of the lawsuits, said this is not the close lawsuit to woody with the contented due to the fact that Trump is offering a “warped reading” of the 14th Amendment that is astatine likelihood with Supreme Court precedent. "I bash deliberation this is simply a precise imperfect conveyance to person to rise the question astir nationwide injunctions ... due to the fact that it’s precise wide that the 14th Amendment applies uniformly crossed states if you’re calved here,” Platkin said.

___

Associated Press writer Valerie Gonzalez successful McAllen, Texas, contributed to this report.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten oregon redistributed without permission.