13 hours ago
5
Follow ZDNET: Add america arsenic a preferred source on Google.
ZDNET's cardinal takeaways:
- Just 5% of endeavor customers are profiting from generative AI.
- A bottom-up versus top-down attack tin amended implementation success.
- AI companies are making large promises successful a bubble, astir of which are unfulfilled.
Investment successful generative AI whitethorn be booming, but astir idiosyncratic businesses utilizing it person yet to spot the payoff. In fact, a caller MIT study recovered that 95% of enterprises attempting to harness the exertion aren't seeing measurable results successful gross oregon growth.
Also: Gen AI disillusionment looms, according to Gartner's 2025 Hype Cycle report
The study, conducted by MIT's Networked Agents and Decentralized AI (NANDA) project, was based connected interviews with implicit 150 concern leaders and an investigation of 300 concern deployments of generative AI.
"Just 5% of integrated AI pilots are extracting millions successful value, portion the immense bulk stay stuck with nary measurable P&L impact," the authors constitute successful the report.
It paints a stark opposition betwixt promises and reality: portion tech developers are selling AI tools similar agents arsenic productivity boosters, NANDA's caller study indicates that for each but a vanishingly tiny minority, the exertion is having small to nary effect connected businesses' bottommost lines. What accounts for the immense disparity?
What isn't moving - and what could
It mostly boils down to a substance of bureaucratic inefficiency. Generative AI tools tin supply ratio gains successful the hands of competent individuals, but erstwhile concern leaders effort to integrate them into existing, company-wide operations and workflows, they thin to propulsion a wrench into the organizational machinery.
The main crushed for this, according to the report, is that the generative AI systems that astir businesses are attempting to deploy internally and astatine standard deficiency the quality to seamlessly accommodate with existing organizational workflows, yet making them much of a hindrance than an accelerant.
"The halfway obstruction to scaling is not infrastructure, regulation, oregon talent. It is learning," the authors write. "Most GenAI systems bash not clasp feedback, accommodate to context, oregon amended implicit time." While an quality to retrieve past interactions, customize outputs to antithetic contexts, and larn implicit clip are each cardinal traits of AI, the authors are specifically referring to the discourse of the technology's usage wrong enterprise-scale operations.
One of the implications of the caller survey truthful seems to beryllium that successful bid for businesses to marque the astir of generative AI, they'd bash good to instrumentality a bottom-up (allowing employees to experimentation and observe their optimal mode of human-AI collaboration) arsenic opposed to a top-down attack (forcing each employees to usage a peculiar instrumentality successful a mode that's tightly controlled by executives and supervisors).
Also: Stop utilizing AI for these 9 enactment tasks - here's why
Another inclination that emerged from the survey was flawed prioritization successful the exertion of generative AI. Many businesses that were failing to nett from the exertion were utilizing it for selling and sales, portion the 5% that were utilizing it successfully tended to bash truthful done the automation of much fine-grained and mundane "back-office" tasks.
Based connected their study, the authors foretell that aboriginal occurrence volition beryllium to those businesses that deploy agentic and adaptable models successful the close places, portion those that take a general, top-down attack volition proceed to beryllium frustrated.
"The adjacent question of adoption volition beryllium won not by the flashiest models," they write, "but by the systems that larn and retrieve and/or by systems that are customized built for a circumstantial process."
AI hype and taste pressure
On its surface, the NANDA survey seems to lend enactment to the content that generative AI is thing but a monolithic hype bubble that volition soon pop, not dissimilar the short-lived firm unreserved into the metaverse that preceded it. If specified a monolithic proportionality of businesses aren't seeing results, past surely that means the exertion is being pedaled connected bare promises, right?
Time volition tell. For now, companies crossed the committee are doubling down connected their investments successful AI, promising customers and investors that the emergence of much agentic systems volition usher successful a aureate property of prosperity, creativity, and leisure. At the aforesaid clip -- and connected the heels of a GPT-5 motorboat that received mixed reviews -- OpenAI CEO Sam Altman himself said helium sees an AI bubble taking shape.
Also: 5 ways automation tin velocity up your regular workflow - and implementation is easy
Meanwhile, the wide taste clasp of AI means that companies are facing immense unit to integrate the exertion rapidly -- oregon hazard looking similar dinosaurs. As NANDA's survey indicates, this unreserved is, successful galore cases, seemingly taking spot astatine the disbursal of immoderate benignant of well-calculated plan, and arsenic a result, investments successful generative AI are starring galore companies nowhere.
Even astatine the idiosyncratic level, generative AI tin beryllium counterproductive successful the semipermanent -- adjacent portion boosting productivity successful the present. A caller survey conducted by Workday, for example, recovered a correlation betwixt dense usage of AI astatine enactment and worker burnout, portion different studies find grounds that AI usage degrades captious reasoning skills.
English (US) ·